Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

September 2001 Document: Military Orders To Prepare For US Attacks Against Iraq After 9/11
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | June 20 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/20/2006 10:21:15 AM PDT by jveritas

In document ISGP-2003-00026334 there are two top secret memo dated September 24 2001 one of them (page 57 of the pdf document) talks about military urgent preparations for a US attack against Iraq and the other (page 6 of the pdf document) talks for urgent military preparations in case of US attacks against Afghanistan. These memos which came from the Iraq Air Force Command asked their troops to prepare as if “There is no way but a US attack against the country” and of course by country they mean Iraq.

Beginning of Translation of page 57 of document document ISGP-2003-00026334

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

Top Secret

The Command of the Air Force

The Commander Office

Number 246

Date 24 September 2001

To: Aide of the Commander for The Operations; Aide of the Commander for Training, Aide of the Commander for Technical Matters, Aide of the Commander for Administrative Matters, The Security Organization of the Air Force.

Subject: The Operations Cell Meeting

1. The top secret letter from the office of Chief of the Army Staff, R.A.J, A.S and Security/ 1/9/6 cell 7022 on 23 September 2001, the approval of the Mr. Chief of the Army Staff was obtained to work according to the recommendation shown below:

A. The Commands and Corps must act as if the American aggression against the country is no other way but happening and therefore this demand gain time and take the appropriate measures.

B. Confirm the importance of the security of the replacement headquarters and the evacuation sites because it will be targeted by the collaborators.

C. Instruct to absolutely prohibit the use the wireless devices and the mobile phones in the evacuation sites and the replacement headquarters for the purpose of these sites security.

D. Strongly insist that the commands of the First and Fifth Corps use more intelligence sources to obtain as much information as possible about the enemy in the sector ( American-Turkish- The gang of destruction) and notify us with any developments.

2. Mr. Commander viewed what was in it and his Excellency commented the following:

((Inform the Operations/ The Technical/ The Training/Administrative/ The Security Organization to do what is necessary)). Please do the necessary.

Signature….

Aviator General

Salem Ahmad Sultan Qassab

Secretary

24 September 2001.

(1-1)

Top Secret

End of translation of page 57.

Beginning of the translation of page 61 of document document ISGP-2003-00026334

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

Top Secret

The Command of the Air Force

The Commander Office

Number 247

Date 24 September 2001

To: All Aides

Subject: The Operation Cell meeting

1. The top secret letter from the office of Chief of the Army Staff, R.A.J, A.S and Security/ 1/9/1/7059 on 24 September 2001, Mr. Chairman of the Army Staff reviewed the minute of meeting of Operation Cell on 23 September 2001 and his Excellency approval was obtained for the following:

A. Inform the Commands, the Departments, all the Directorates and Establishments to immediately move to the Replacement Headquarters in case a strike occurred against Afghanistan.

B. Ensure that the border observation posts and the Air Defense posts to inspect and observe the sectors in precise fashion day and night with the necessity of the Air Defense Command an the Commands of the Corps to test and inspect the communication system and there will be committees coming in the next week from the General Headquarters to test what was mentioned above.

Mr. Commander reviewed what was in the letter and his Excellency commented with the following:

Inform all the Aides and the units of the Command Headquarters to work according to paragraph A for sure.

Please review and do what is necessary.

Signature….

Aviator General

Salem Ahmad Sultan Qassab


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 200109; 20010924; 911; iraq; iraqiintelligence; jveritas; onfreep; plausibledeniablity; prewardocs; saddam; saddam911link; saddamhussein; statesponsor; waronterror; waronterrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2006 10:21:17 AM PDT by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Now why would Iraq expect an attack in response to 9/11? Unless...


2 posted on 06/20/2006 10:24:35 AM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Wonderful!

September 2001 Document: Military Orders To Prepare For US Attacks Against Iraq After 9/11

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

Ray Robison’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

Mark Eichenlaub Documenting Saddam Hussein's State Sponsorship of Terrorism

3 posted on 06/20/2006 10:25:17 AM PDT by eyespysomething
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Very interesting.


4 posted on 06/20/2006 10:26:46 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Sounds like Ahmad was soiling his pants knowing full well that Iraq was deeply involved with Osama.


5 posted on 06/20/2006 10:27:23 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Exactly.

Also you notice in the second memo they were aware that the strike will be against Afghanistan but they were still taking all these military preparations.

6 posted on 06/20/2006 10:27:45 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

You know, it wasn't all that long ago people were looking at me like I had two heads for saying that Saddam was up to his eyeballs in 9/11. Means, motive, and opportunity, he had them all, in spades. I guess I can take the tinfoil off now!


7 posted on 06/20/2006 10:29:05 AM PDT by thoughtomator (A thread without a comment on immigration is not complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven; jveritas; Cap Huff; Dog; Coop; AdmSmith; jmc1969; Straight Vermonter; Wiz; ...

Very, very interesting,....and why Afghanistan.....so many questions.,....


8 posted on 06/20/2006 10:29:41 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

This is important information, jveritas. Attorneys call it "consciousness of guilt".

Simon Reeve wrote an important book called The New Jackals. The book is primarily about Osama bin Laden and Ramzi Yousef.

There was important information that I've not seen reported elsewhere but that the reporter sourced quite well.

Two weeks prior to 9/11, Saddam put his troops on their highest state of alert since the Gulf War and put his two wives together into the same bunker. Saddam had never put those women together before because they detested each other. Then Saddam went into a secure bunker and didn't emerge until 10/01.


9 posted on 06/20/2006 10:31:28 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; jveritas
Now why would Iraq expect an attack in response to 9/11? Unless...

Exactly!

jveritas, you ROCK. :-)

10 posted on 06/20/2006 10:33:02 AM PDT by Allegra (Mookie Sadr's Next!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

VERY interesting!


11 posted on 06/20/2006 10:33:41 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks for posting!

Bookmarked!


12 posted on 06/20/2006 10:34:03 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Very interesting. I hope I can find a document that talks about their military readiness orders two weeks before 9/11 and translate it. This will be very a important one.


13 posted on 06/20/2006 10:35:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; jveritas

Of all the translations that jveritas is doing this is one of the most important I'd say; I just wish someone would pick this up!

Maybe Tony Snow still surfs FR ocassionally, and can tell his boss about this; quit taking all the "Iraq wasn't involved in 9/11" guff!


14 posted on 06/20/2006 10:35:11 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; eyespysomething

[move to the Replacement Headquarters in case a strike occurred against Afghanistan.]

Curious that they would reposition and alert their people if it's a strike on Afghanistan.

Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shep Smith)
Hardball@msnbc.com
Imus@msnbc.com
Myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
rush@eibnet.com
Beltway@foxnews.com (Barnes & Kondracke)
Friends@foxnews.com
humanevents@humaneventsonline.com (Ann Coulter)
howiecarr@wrko.co
http://www.michaelmedved.com/askmike
http://intelligence.senate.gov/ (Senate Intelligence Committee)


15 posted on 06/20/2006 10:35:36 AM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
B. Confirm the importance of the security of the replacement headquarters and the evacuation sites because it will be targeted by the collaborators.

C. Instruct to absolutely prohibit the use the wireless devices and the mobile phones in the evacuation sites and the replacement headquarters for the purpose of these sites security.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just asking here, but ... these wouldn't be WMD evacuation sites by chance now would they?

16 posted on 06/20/2006 10:35:44 AM PDT by The G Man (The Red States ... the world's only hope for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Two weeks prior to 9/11, Saddam put his troops on their highest state of alert since the Gulf War and put his two wives together into the same bunker. Saddam had never put those women together before because they detested each other. Then Saddam went into a secure bunker and didn't emerge until 10/01.

I'm finding myself glad that Saddam's alive at the moment. Which is unusual.

Now if only we could get him off in a dark room with a pair of pliers and maybe...oh, I don't know, a chainsaw or woodchipper and start asking some questions.

17 posted on 06/20/2006 10:36:42 AM PDT by Allegra (Mookie Sadr's Next!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

When Saddam's Intel officer met with a broke al Queda in 1998, and then suddenly UBL had the money to finance preparations for 9/11 - that was enough for me.


18 posted on 06/20/2006 10:37:29 AM PDT by wvobiwan (If you're not part of the solution, you're obviously a liberal Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras

I think so too.


19 posted on 06/20/2006 10:39:06 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Fox had a spokesman on this morning who is also translating documents. Unfortunately, his presentation was less than exciting. The F&F crew had to prompt him on what to say. Though Fox is on the right track, when they are on the air with this info, they and their spokesmen need to be more forceful and emphatic in presenting the evidence and interpreting its importance with respect to our attack and invasion of Iraq.


20 posted on 06/20/2006 10:39:40 AM PDT by CedarDave (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson