To: mtbopfuyn
that's what hubby is saying...not so much the US but Israel....have you seen all the reports of congresscritters saying that the US better stay out of Iran?...hubby also thinks this so called surge is re-enforcements for something that is about to happen.
13 posted on
01/12/2007 10:41:39 AM PST by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero........God Speed Jonathan......)
To: mystery-ak
All of these assets (2nd Carrier Group, AWACS, F16s Tanker) could easily be part of a support and/or offensive package. Don't forget the Assets (B1,B2, B52 Bombers that do not need to be forward deployed any longer. All of these assets can be deployed from Kansas or Nebraska.
To: mystery-ak
Give me a second...I'm sending you a freepmail for Mike.
16 posted on
01/12/2007 10:49:17 AM PST by
Dog
To: mystery-ak
I would thing that having Iraq suppressed as much as possible would be needed if something was going to happen in neighboring country.
18 posted on
01/12/2007 10:51:08 AM PST by
HereInTheHeartland
(Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
To: mystery-ak
If your hubby's right...THIS is the kind of "strategery" I love!!! Ride 'em cowboy!
19 posted on
01/12/2007 10:51:38 AM PST by
NordP
(America Votes: So sad to find out the majority is self-centered, short-sighted, and impatient.)
To: mystery-ak
Let's see, F117's going into South Korea, a second battle group in the Middle East, the rolling up of AQ in the horn of Africa, President Bush's decision to surge troops to settle things in Baghdad and now a flock of F-16 w/ support settling into Turkey, etc, etc, etc
Hum, on second thought nothing unusual going on. NOT
58 posted on
01/12/2007 11:39:30 AM PST by
lowbuck
(The Blue Card (US Passport). . . Don't leave home without it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson