WASHINGTON POST, MTV NEWS CITE MY ANTI-HILLARY VIDEO

MTV News, Washington Post ^ | 3.23.07 | Mia T

[NYC Republican]

Incredible job overall.

[Hostage]

I believe most personal attacks on HRC will backfire because those that support a democrat ticket no matter who is the candidate will always view such attacks as mean-spirited.

Hillary wins when she 'suffers' a personal attack.

Hillary loses when she 'is angered' to make a personal attack.

HRC is shrewd and cunning, not smart but cunning. There is a difference. But her cunning shrewdness is often mistaken for smart.

When HRC is angered enough to stumble and make a personal attack, those that had viewed her as 'smart' are embarrassed and become withdrawn.

The key to her defeat is not through personal attacks, but in tactics that make her lose her temper and blow her facade.

She will have people script the issues and stage the appearances. There will be no defeating her on the issues. There will be massive vote fraud in key districts.

Republicans and Conservatives will be out in force against her but it will take the swing voter to defeat her. The swing voter has no clue or willingness to understand that HRC is a radical hardcore Saul Alinsky leftist. And they will not be persuaded by any Republican candidate against her unless there are developments from now until election day that make them persuaded to vote Republican.

Such developments include:

1. Major peace outbreak in Iraq.
2. Capture of Bin Laden and Zawahiri.
3. GW Bush on the attack against leftists and their stooges.
4. War with Iran and Syria.

These developments if executed well will marginalize HRC. They will compel the swing voter to vote for the 'Strong Hand' as a means of maintaining confidence into the future. They will not be swayed by any other means except possibly...:

A charismatic populist leader with presence, humor and delivery.

Fred Thompson.

Yes, Hillary can be defeated with humor, but it must be humor that does not attack her. Remember Reagan's 'attack' was a counterattack to the insinuation that he was too old, a counterattack made highly effective because it was cast in humorous wit:

I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience. If I still have time, I might add, Mr. Trewhitt, I might add that it was Seneca or it was Cicero, I don't know which, that said if it was not for the elders correcting the mistakes of the young, there would be no state.

Let's have an example:

REPORTER: Senator Clinton, I want to raise an issue that is widely known to almost every American and that is the ever rising costs of healthcare and the inaccessibility of healthcare for millions of Americans. You have already led a major task force on universal healthcare. Do you still support universal healthcare and how do you forsee it solving the healthcare crisis that faces America?

CLINTON: You know, I have spoken about this issue in my campaign and I see people are ready for 'change'. It has become clear that the present system is not 'sustainable' and that we need 'change' to ensure that millions of Americans and 'children' who presently lack access to healthcare will be able to enjoy the benefits that the 'rest of us' enjoy. By using the buying power of the federal government and encouraging our partners in all states to invest in a 'national purchasing pool', we can cut the costs of medical care. My administration will make it a national priority to 'invest' in a healthcare system that will be a model for the 'rest of the world' and guarantees healthcare for all and the 'children'.

REPORTER: Senator Thompson, comment?

THOMPSON: Any government proposal to nationalize an industry that forms 15% of the nation's economic activity is easy to do. All that's necessary are higher taxes and a government willing to go after any medical practitioner that refuses to register and abide by the rules of the national program. The problem with healthcare costs is there are too many middlemen with their hands on the dollars that are no one's business other than the patient and their doctor. It's a business that is grossly inefficient. To think that more government administration of healthcare is going to solve this problem of inefficiency is insane. The way to fix this business is to cut out the middleman by ensuring Americans have money to pay their doctors directly and have a catastrophic insurance policy to cover chronic illnesses. If my opponent wants to play the part of health czar in leading big government to run your personal life, then all I can say is don't forget to 'break a leg'.

___________________________________________________________ There are numerous numerous examples where we can let HRC 'step in it' on her own. Just don't attack her personally unless it's a counterattack. Use humor and by all means try to frustrate her to the point she loses her temper. That's how to win.

[Mia T]

If the video were ad hominem argument, I would agree. It would play right into hillary clinton's only known effective pose: that of victim. That is why, in fact, the original mashup, 'Vote Different,' failed to sway Dems, at least according to Zogby. See my last post, which is on this very point:

Big Brother is watching you, but are you watching Big Brother? (HILLARY-IMAGE FLAW IN AD MASHUP)

The purpose of this video, OTOH, is to expose the clinton menace, to alert and inform women with the facts of clinton abuse of women, abuse of power, and willful terrorism failure.

I am targeting women because hillary clinton is targeting women.

hillary clinton trying to pass herself off as a feminist icon is a travesty.

[Hostage]

Mia T,

I think you are one of the most talented participants in the logosphere that I have seen over many years.

I have seen your work from the days the Clintons were still in office. There is no doubt you made many people aware of the absolute danger posed by the Clintons and I believe you did it in nonpartisan manner.

For every hit piece that is thrown against these grifters, there are an equal number of hit pieces against GWB and other prominent Republicans. For example GWB is a cocaine using alcoholic with brain damage, GWB conspired to bring down the WTC, GWB is Hitler. We conservatives think of such persons that put out this garbage as the 'fringe lunatic left'. They think of people that put out hit pieces on the Clintons as 'right-wing extremists'.

A different psychology needs to be used to attract the all-important swing voter.

I know personal characteristics of HRC that drive the ***male*** gender to a fit of disgust; the nervous cackle, the slow monotone delivery, the simpleton proposals with no practical backup, the women vs. men angle, the woe-is-me-I'm-a-victim repose to almost everything, the idiot antics such as putting on a yankee cap and saying I have always been a yankee fan, the constant condescension, the shallow superficial facade masking evil intentions, the dangerous emotions and Machiavellian undertones, the lack of integrity and trustworthiness.

I don't know of any traits that uniquely rankle the ***female*** gender because I have no experience to draw from. I am not sure even if HRC's unattractive thighs are a negative because obesity is such a problem in this country that who knows how many women in this country would look at her thighs and think 'ah, she's just like most of us'.

I really believe Clinton is going to have her issues crafted for her. I think a good portion of the election will rest on people voting against her personal qualities or staying home because they would never vote Republican otherwise and they are embarassed, ashamed or disgusted to think of voting for this menace. Personal traits will be key to swing votes, not issues (because issues will be crafted to overcome their objections).

Now how would you think to write a script that would bring out personal traits that women abhor about HRC but at the same time do not attack her personally? How will the tables be turned so that it is HRC ***herself*** who evokes an image of ridiculous? Would it be sarcasm? What would provoke her to anger?

Example:

How about a reverse psychology skit where shrill and scorned women with big thighs and scowling expressions, and also other women with blank looks that would epitomize vacuity, and others still that are negatively viewed for a variety of reasons; how about this group of women get together in some sort of women-only meeting with a Mao-size poster of HRC behind them, and we hear these women gab about the need for a 'Strong Woman'. The skit ends with a caption to 'Support Women in a Fascist Male Dominant World - Vote Hillary'.

[PGalt]

277,000+ hits. The hits just keep on comin', Mia T. Great work.

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Amen! They are fit for one thing - jail! America must never let them near Presidential power again.....

[StarFan]

How marvelous. You certainly earned it my FRiend.

[exit82]

Brava,Mia T, brava.

You are a treasure.

[jla]

RE: Post #112

Don't know what that psychedelic image is supposed to be but this is mandelbrot!

Now get thee in thy kitchen and start baking! (And don't be afraid, or too proud, to ask the older ladies in the family for help!)

[Mia T]

It's a Mandelbrot set.

[jla]

It's a Mandelbrot set.

I'd prefer a baker's set!

[Mia T]

thank you, FRiend :)

[Mia T]

Thank you, exit82. :)

[Mia T]

;)

[jla]

;) --------> smiley winks are good, but they don't go quite as nice with a glass of milk as do the mandelbrot!

...and we had had a RECORD weekend for my Church during this years Irish festival.
(that organ will be heard, come heck or high water)

[Mia T]

That's wonderful. The organ, if not the mandelbrot.