Skip to comments.Funny Money [more clinton-machine fuzzy math]
Posted on 04/04/2007 6:05:40 PM PDT by Mia T
more clinton-machine fuzzy math:
Such conditions, irrespective of vote tally, can never a 'landslide' make.
Nonetheless, missus clinton dumped 30-million-dollars' worth of false advertising 2 into the race: Standard-issue clinton sleight-of-hand intended to transmute:
The purpose of the 30-million-dollar demagogic infusion was to create the illusion of a landslide in New York in '06, which would, (so the wishful thinking goes), create the illusion of national electability in '08, an absolute prerequisite to nomination for someone with a Q Score as wanting as missus clinton's. 6
The official New York State Board of Elections tally will not be available until mid-December, a sufficient time lag for Pinch and Company 7 to exaggerate the significance of the hillary vote and for the mischaracterization to become firmly fixed in our collective 'history.' Truth and America matter not at all to The New York Times. Agenda is everything. 8 The Times' clinton endorsements redux. 9
If missus clinton won two-thirds of the total vote and two-thirds of the male vote, she could not have won three-quarters of female vote unless the total female vote was at or about zero. Similarly, if she won two-thirds of the total vote and three-quarters of female vote, she could not have won two-thirds of the male vote.
For her entire adult (such as it is) life, zipper-hoisting has been missus clinton's principal means of upward mobility. 10 This election was no different.
Zipper-hoisting has, in the past, proven to be a sticky wicket for missus clinton, owing not to antithetical feminist ideology, as one would expect -- feminists willingly sacrificed feminism on the altar of clintonism -- but to zipper choice, her rather injudicious attachment early on to a certain zipper habitually on the downslide.
This time she picked zippers a bit better, glomming onto Eliot's.
Contrary to 'conventional wisdom,' the coattails (if you'll pardon the mixed metaphor) were Eliot's, not hers. The three percent who voted for Spitzer who could not overcome their revulsion to pull the lever for hillary tell it all.
your fastest bump ;) thx
Your fans live to bump.
Thank you, jla. :)
I’m sure you, (unlike Gore), didn’t have any trouble figuring out who’s who in TJ’s DR. (Or is it the entry hall?)
How many millions is the Rodham-rodent carrying leftover from the senatorial election over to the run for party nomination?
I think it’s $10 million.
NOTE: Barack Obama has likely hammered hillary clinton in the money race DESPITE THIS:
We have argued elsewhere that the only way missus clinton can win elections is to run virtually unopposed, and then only if she remains immobil, hidden, mute, a prisoner of her own ineptitude, repulsiveness and criminality.
But of the three, it is missus clinton's repulsiveness--her ugliness--that will do her in.
The voters routinely ignore ineptitude, forgive criminality, but they never abide ugliness. Never.
Does she have to designate which campaign that will be used in ... and is it in addition to the 26 raised this quarter?
It’s in addition to the 26, and she doesn’t have to specify.
But as the article points out, the 26 is likely nowhere near 26, (assuming an adherence to the rule of law, which is a big assumption when it comes to the clintons).
Thanx Miss D.
Was it ever, I wonder....
Thanks, babe ................... FRegards
you’re welcome, gonzo. :)
The POWER of propaganda, the elite protecting/enabling the elite.
Thanks for your work, Mia T.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.