Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stem cell vote set for Congress this week
Reuters ^ | April 8, 2007

Posted on 04/08/2007 7:11:48 PM PDT by siunevada

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Stem cells will be at the top of the agenda for the U.S. Senate when it returns on Tuesday with supporters of the research hoping they can change the president's mind on the issue and opponents hoping to have a say about their stand.

The Senate will consider two bills, one virtually identical to a bill vetoed by President George W. Bush last year that would have expanded and encouraged federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research.

The other is a compromise measure worked out by Republicans Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia and Norm Coleman of Minnesota. It would encourage stem cell research on embryos that have naturally lost the ability to develop into fetuses, such as those that have died "naturally" during fertility treatments. The compromise bill also would support the creation of a bank of stem cells taken from amniotic fluid and placentas -- two recently discovered potential sources.

This bill replaces last year's alternative sponsored by Kansas Republican Sam Brownback, which would ban human embryonic stem cell research and encourage research using other types of stem cells.

******

It is not clear how much support there is for either Senate bill, although opponents of human embryonic stem cell research, such as Brownback, have signaled they will vote for the compromise bill. They also said they were looking forward to making use of up to 20 hours of scheduled debate.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: fetalstemcells; geneticcanibalism; humanrights; peoplehelpingpeople

1 posted on 04/08/2007 7:11:48 PM PDT by siunevada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: siunevada
It would encourage stem cell research on embryos that have naturally lost the ability to develop into fetuses, such as those that have died "naturally" during fertility treatments.

Why do I predict that, were this to pass, the number of embryos "naturally" losing their ability to develop into fetuses would skyrocket?

2 posted on 04/08/2007 7:17:16 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: siunevada
The same Senators who were fans of LAETRILE or who invested in some sort of government bond deal in Nigeria will vote for this one.

Didn't any of these guys ever figure out that the only outcome anyone predicts for the most advanced development possible with embryonic stem cells is the creation of stem cells that will be incompatible with the recipients?!

3 posted on 04/08/2007 7:26:52 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson