Posted on 04/17/2007 9:23:18 PM PDT by do the dhue
Here are a couple headlines about a Iraqi timeline for US withdraw
Moqtada al-Sadr defies Iraqi government by pulling out 6 ministers (because Iraqi Government will not set a timeline for US withdraw)
check the story at ArabMonitor.info
and
Anti-war House Dems demand 'clear timeline' for pullout
Can someone tell me why there is no headline that reads something like?:
Al Sadr and Demorats demand time line.
or
Bush Maliki stand their ground against al Sadr Peloser time line
Come on!! What is wrong with the media and the stinkin' demorats. This is the story here. Heck, al Sadr gave up his power to make a statement for a time line. I wish the demorats would do the same. Demorats and al Sadr are wanting the US to pull out Iraq . This is what we should be talking about.
Let me get crazy here: who knows, maybe that is why Peloser went to Syria. So she could get the message to al Sadr? I don't know, I am in Texas. I would have no clue, but I think it is a legit question. Al Sadr and Peloser are trying to ram the same thing down their respected leaders mouth.
Our media has nothing to say about this and the Republicans won't link the demorats and the terrorist for some reason.
I will. I see it and I'll say it.
The Commie Demorats are traitors and if they don't like being called a traitor, they shouldn't give me a reason to say it.
Bush is right about this. He should Veto that bill and the House and Senate need to get Bush a bill that has no timeline and will take care of our Troops every need.
Bush: Timeline gives "our enemies the victory they desperately want." at CNN
I don’t know, but I will bet that, it wasn’t over until Peloser said so.
Hey, they need to separate the sheep from the goats - Here, this test will help...
Are you a Democrat, Republican or a Redneck ?
Here is a little test that will help you decide. The answer can be found by posing the following situation and question:
You’re walking down a deserted street with your wife and two small children.
Suddenly, an Islamic Terrorist with a huge knife comes around the corner, locks eyes with you, screams obscenities, praises Allah, raises the knife, and charges at you.
You are carrying a Glock 40 cal, and you are an expert shot. You have mere seconds before he reaches you and your family.
What do you do?
Democrat’s Answer:
Well, that’s not enough information to answer the question! Does the man look poor or oppressed?
Have I ever done anything to him that would inspire him to attack?
Could we run away?
What does my wife think?
What about the kids?
Could I possibly swing the gun like a club and knock the knife out of his hand?
What does the law say about this situation?
Does the Glock have appropriate safety built into it?
Why am I carrying a loaded gun anyway, and what kind of message does this send to society and to my children?
Is it possible he’d be happy with just killing me?
Does he definitely want to kill me, or would he be content just to wound me?
If I were to grab his knees and hold on, could my family get away while he was stabbing me?
Should I call 9-1-1?
Why is this street so deserted?
We need to raise taxes, have a paint and weed day and make this a happier, healthier street that would discourage such behavior.
This is all so confusing!
I need to discuss this with some friends over a latte and try to come to a consensus.
Republican’s Answer:
BANG!
Redneck’s Answer:
BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! Click.....
(sounds of reloading).
BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG! BANG!BANG! click ...
Daughter: “Nice grouping, Daddy! Were those the Winchester Silver Tips or Hollow Points?”
Son: “You got him Pop! Can I shoot the next one?”
Wife: “You are not taking that to the Taxidermist!”
Good point
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.