Replies

2 posted on 04/19/2007 11:07:56 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; joanie-f; ...

3 posted on 04/19/2007 11:10:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))

Mia, you are ... no, I'll start over, for the sake of peace.

Mia, nominating a person who represents the planks in the Republican party platform is what primary voting is all about. The effort to get more to participate in that process is far more important than pushing a person into the nomination who doesn't represent the planks in the party platform ... unless you want to change the planks and thus the representative reason for the party as it is currently defined.

Short response, get your butt busy turning out more conservatives to vote in the primaries instead of trying to pursuade conservatives to support a person who does not represent conservative principles.

Mia, you do such a great job exposing the liberalism of the Rodham-rodent. Why is it you cannot see how similar Rudy is to the Rodham-rodent? If she is bad for her liberalism, why is Rudy good for his liberalism?

5 posted on 04/19/2007 11:16:36 AM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for others.)

Bump! So many excellent posts, bravissimi!

So my question is, why is Rudy still leading in the polls? Hello, are we not at war?

82 posted on 04/19/2007 5:01:11 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794