The Antiwar Right Brings the Republicans Home (Ron Paul)

The Sunday Times (London) ^ | May 20, 2007 | Andrew Sullivan

[ZULU]

O.K. Maybe he partied through Wolrd History.

His cume was only 77 you know and he flunked two courses. But that puts him ahead of Kerry whose cume was 76 and who flunked three courses.

[ZULU]

Sorry. I thought this was a posting about Bush, not Ron Paul. I think he is really wrong on foreign policy though - we are in a culture war with Islam and it has nothing to do with our presence over there, and everything to do with their desire to control over here.

[janetgreen]

Interesting article, and I think that the stage has been set for something of that nature to occur. It's absolutely clear that an American president who really thought that another "9-11" could possibly occur, wiping out the lives of even more Americans, wouldn't have left the borders wide open and allowed millions of invaders to come in.

That's when many of us lost faith in this president, then watched as he and his neocon buddies led us further down this treacherous path where we're heading.

We waited for the president to take a step in the right direction, but IMO, everything he's done has been virulently anti-American.

[Designer]

"..a government of American traitors."

Yup.

I began studying this about 14 years ago. Now what?

I mean; other than what we are already doing, what else can we do?

[Designer]

"The coup is almost complete. "

Yes.

[Designer]

"..and everything to do with their desire to control over here."

One could say the same thing about the one-worlders "over here" wanting to control "over there".

[Designer]

Jason, would you mind writing the link in English, please? My finder will not find it.

[Jason_b]

Try these.

http://progressive.org/mag_wx051807

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070509-12.html

[FreeReign]

Ron Paul is not stupid.

That would make a great campaign slogan.

[ZULU]

Uhhh - YES!!!

[Designer]

Thank you!

[FreeReign]

Moreover Bush’s admission runs counter to your claim that there was a connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. Your claim is that only the brainwashed believe it isn’t so, which by logic dumps Bush in my camp. I suspect if there were evidence he would be the first to endorse it, not to say that none exists. Maybe Dubya needs to contact you and get the conclusive evidence that so far he says doesn’t exist.

Argue all you want about the past.

Meanwhile, Al Qaeda is Iraq now and Paul wants us to leave.

[Pelham]

So do the folks over at Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch. You’ll have a hard time selling them as being soft on Islamic terrorism.

[streetpreacher]

Well, according to the facts as you have laid them out, how could you absolve Eisenhower? What U.S. national interest was at stake in Iran in the 1950’s?

[FreeReign]

Al Qaeda is Iraq now and Paul wants us to leave.

So do the folks over at Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch. You’ll have a hard time selling them as being soft on Islamic terrorism.

I give you a fact, that Al Qaeda is in Iraq and you respond by dropping the name Robert Spencer and you say how he wants to leave Iraq.

LOL! That changes everything right? Al Qaeda is in Iraq, Robert Spencer and Ron Paul says we should leave -- therefor we should leave.

Sure.

[Pelham]

Tell me what you know of Robert Spencer.

I’d like your take on what’s happening in the Palestinian camps in Lebanon right now. How does that square with your belief that al Qaeda is a serious threat to take over Iraq. Does it surprise you to see al Qaeda attacked by rival Islamic groups? Think that might happen in Iraq?

Quiz time- which sect does al Qaeda come from, Sunni or Shia? And which is the majority in Iraq?