Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: The Blitherer
To: The Blitherer
3 posted on
06/15/2007 1:15:02 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: The Blitherer
Perhaps it’s the House starting to feel the heat.
Congratulations, regardless.
5 posted on
06/15/2007 1:15:56 PM PDT by
IslandJeff
("I used to care, but things have changed" - Robert Zimmerman)
To: The Blitherer
It’s about time. The only thing that is going to make anything enforceable is to stop states and cities from flouting federal law.
6 posted on
06/15/2007 1:15:56 PM PDT by
livius
To: The Blitherer
To: alexsmithers; b4its2late; BigTom85; BikerJoe; blackdiamondracer; Brad's Gramma; BradtotheBone; ...
To: The Blitherer
9 posted on
06/15/2007 1:16:59 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: The Blitherer
10 posted on
06/15/2007 1:17:13 PM PDT by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
From the article:
If I were (Speaker of the House) Nancy Pelosi, I’d be asking if she could pass a vote on amnesty on the House side,” Tancredo said. “If she lost 50 Democrats on this one, and she says she needs 70 Republicans to pass the immigration plan, this is an interesting indicator of things coming down the pike, and that the times, they are a-changing.”
To: The Blitherer
This IS surprising - I’ve heard that there was a big gap between what the Senate wanted to do on immigration and what the House wanted to do, but I didn’t think it was this wide.
Must be true what they used to say, that the House is more partisan in general, but is far better on mainstream issues.
Tom Tancredo may be a one-trick pony, but that’s some trick he’s got there.
12 posted on
06/15/2007 1:17:53 PM PDT by
Baladas
To: The Blitherer
Holy crap. 50 democrats. Hopefully this is an indicator of how the House will vote on Bush’s Immigration bill.
To: The Blitherer
I enjoy the symbolism of this, but fear it will backfire if a tragedy in these places occurs and services are withheld.
15 posted on
06/15/2007 1:19:40 PM PDT by
Scarchin
(+)
To: The Blitherer
In before the bots wow us with anti-Tancredo rhetoric?
Conservatism 1, faux-conservatism 0. Hunter’s fence and Ron Paul’s anchor baby fix next please!
16 posted on
06/15/2007 1:20:38 PM PDT by
M203M4
(Vote Fruity Giuliani or the terrists will win! Abortion & gun control = price for freedumb!)
To: The Blitherer
The House passed the amendment, 234 to 189, with 50 Democrats voting in favor.
17 posted on
06/15/2007 1:20:55 PM PDT by
kidd
To: SittinYonder
To: The Blitherer
Hooray for our side! Thank you Congressman Tancredo! I hope this sends a message to the Senate. Their shamnesty bill will never pass in the House!
Unfortunately, our Mexican President will never sign this sanctuary legislation into law, even though the people have spoken.
20 posted on
06/15/2007 1:21:11 PM PDT by
NRA2BFree
("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
To: The Blitherer
I believe the Congressman is making major headway by sticking to his guns, and talking common sense, every chance that he gets.
This may only be a small victory; but any victory right now, for our side, is tremendously significant. The tide may really be starting to turn; but we have a long, long way to go.
William Flax
22 posted on
06/15/2007 1:21:26 PM PDT by
Ohioan
To: The Blitherer
Tancredo and his staffers hooted and cheered from his office across the street from the Capitol immediately after the vote. So are we!
23 posted on
06/15/2007 1:21:39 PM PDT by
kidd
To: The Blitherer
24 posted on
06/15/2007 1:22:15 PM PDT by
1COUNTER-MORTER-68
(THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
