Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hi Heels
I do think it is worth noting that the stated purpose of an affrèrement was OTHER than to allow "same sex marriage". That it may have been abused in such a way should come as no surprise, since other perfectly legitimate enterprises are similarly abused.

This actually gets to the heart of the bias shown in allowing 'domestic partnerships' only for same-sex pairs who have sex with each other. Why can't platonic friends form such a partnership? Apparently, folks in the Middle Ages would have agreed.
15 posted on 08/27/2007 1:29:48 PM PDT by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beezdotcom

Good points.


19 posted on 08/27/2007 1:36:20 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson