To: Hi Heels
I do think it is worth noting that the stated purpose of an affrèrement was OTHER than to allow "same sex marriage". That it may have been abused in such a way should come as no surprise, since other perfectly legitimate enterprises are similarly abused.
This actually gets to the heart of the bias shown in allowing 'domestic partnerships' only for same-sex pairs who have sex with each other. Why can't platonic friends form such a partnership? Apparently, folks in the Middle Ages would have agreed.
To: beezdotcom
19 posted on
08/27/2007 1:36:20 PM PDT by
Sherman Logan
(Scratch a liberal, find a dhimmi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson