Here’s the issue I have with carbon dioxide man. What “other” trace elements are they finding along with CO2 in their core samples: Lead? Additives Gore and Clinton mandated? I’m an engineer, specializing in machine design, but any guy with half a brain ought to figure this stuff out.
When I served in the Navy - non combatant - peace time military, we found Volcanic ash from Pinotubo on the ice cap just like somebody had sprinkled pepper on mashed potatoes.
The liberals want to drop issues like parametrics (object movement via algebraic algorithm - see Chandler’s “wobble”) If they so choose to disbeleive chandler, why are they using computers to post their models, since it was Chandler, under Max Plank’s tuteledge who developed the theory of “i.” In mathematics the square root of negative i (-i) equals -1.
So, Mr. Carbon Dioxide Man, do the math - I want to see it, and by the way i^4 or i to the 4th power equals 1.
As per trace elements, using an infrared photospectrometer - more military training with O2/N2 work - we should see particulate contamination of trace elements other than CO2 - which is very abundant on this planet or plants would not grow - Mr. Carbon Dioxide man needs to defer to Photosysnthesis, I know it is a long word, but he chose to use carbon dioxide, which is two words to my one - infrared photospectrometers read to the .5 parts per million.
Let’s see those trace elements Al, I know you are just busting out with your Objective Quality Evidence (OQE) to those military guys trained in manned QA systems.
Al, you got the proof, I’ll donate the time and the equipment to shoot you down in flames.
S_S
Let’s see those trace elements Al, I know you are just busting out with your Objective Quality Evidence (OQE) to those military guys trained in manned QA systems.
::::::
Right on. Al is a sham who, like all liberals, can only appeal to the uneducated, or ignorant, or equally scammy as Al and his Clinton heritage. Maybe a combination of all of the above. We will see more of this “synthesized leftist crisis hysteria” as time progresses, which will be inversely proportional to the uselfullness and importance of the criminal, reprobate, carpetbagging left.
It will be fun to watch. There never will be any PROOF that Flim-Flam-Al’s assertion that MAN is causing global warming...only much evidence that he has not, and is not. Some basic classes in earth science, and yes, as you point out, some biology, would help Al and his kool-aid-drinking liberal followers see the light and find something honest and credible to do with their time, such as finding a real, legitimate job to earn their money, instead of conning it out of the tax-payers to “fix” a world threatening crisis of their making.....
What are you asking; if the increasing CO2 in the atmosphere is due to anthropogenic emissions?
If you are, have you ever heard of something called the "Suess Effect"? (Before you josh and mention green eggs and ham, I'd look it up.)