Posted on 06/03/2008 5:02:24 AM PDT by mware
The press wants Obama, and Bill & Hill are so passé, they're mad!
We want the facts, please!
You are right: the sheeple are predisposed to believe anything their Oprah’s Obama tells them.
If the Republicans were behind it, they would have waited until October.
It's not even illegal! I'm almost disappointed in the old bag. Of course, it hasn't happened yet...
As I watched Hillary’s speech tonight, I thought, “She’s got something up her sleeve! She’s holding back an ace.”
She looked like the cat who just swallowed the canary. Her smug, satisfied face and confident demeanor (”18,000,000 Americans voted for ME!”) were not the appearances of a defeated competitor.
So, I tend to believe Beckel. It’s not that easy to push Hillary aside. She’s going to push back—HARD!
Another thing tonight—her SS detail looked absolutely frantic at some points. There were extra agents assigned to her, in plain clothes (no pin or earpiece).
Something’s afoot. I wonder if the Obama goons are threatening her.
“Ann Archer keeps saying the same thing over and over again on various threads. She can’t possibly know unless she has heard the tape so it is a mystery as to why she is so adamant.”
A mole, obviously.
If this Michelle Obama “BOMBSHELL” turns out to be true....
Then I’m very inclined to believe that ‘Bill & Hill’ were behind it in some way!!
After 30 yrs, they can play ‘DIRTY POLITICS’ with the best....and usually WIN!!!
If the tape exists, and that really is the transcript, people are missing the point entirely. She’s making a PUN when she says “why’d he”. She’s contrasting it with the actual use of “whitey” in the first sentence, “what’s up with whitey? Why’d he ... etc.” See, she’s making a joke! It’s not that she’s saying either “Why’d he” or “Whitey”, she’s saying BOTH.
Read this way, it is really quite a clever play on words. In my opinion, this makes it far more likely that this really does exist. She’s well educated enough to come up with a great rhetorical trick like that.
Oh, and yes, under this interpretation it is an extremely racist statement and if true, this will absolutely sink Obama.
After all, the job does have a 10% assassination rate.
A bigger question beyond 'when' this hits; is; how. . .why. . .would the 'Obama's' think they were going to escape this?
Given the youtube exposure thus far; of 'facetime' that has reaped it's damage; what might they be thinking; getting this far; only to have the 'big one' hit the fan. The big one; they have known about; all along. Not sure I 'get it'; save the determination of Soros et al; who think/imagine. ..know(?) that with MSM help (along with help of a host of illegal voting snafus in place) that they can survive it all. . .
Am I missing something else here?
(Clearly, it is not the 'little people' who imagine they are 'electing' Obama; when it is the 'big guys' who are pulling the strings here; but they cannot do it without them. . .or perhaps they can . . .)
Is that based on attempts or successful assassinations? Would be interesting to have both.
Of course, there is always Obama's now oft-used responses for whomever the latest embarassment happens to be. . .
'That is not the [Michele] I know'. . .
'I was not there, when [Michele] was speaking'. . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.