Notice that even now, after the big payout, and the near cessation of the investigation, this former FBI puke cannot be brought to even mention the Inspection Service~!
I still think it is incredibly suggestive that the only large-scale anthrax attack in history occurred on the east coast of the US within weeks of 9/11.
Speculation here of course, but it strongly suggests that one or more persons involved with the 9/11 terrorists was left behind to try to sow panic and confusion and more mass casualties.
If the source was unrelated to 9/11 how would it/they happen to be ready with anthrax at that specific moment in history AND risk the obvious associations with the 9/11 attacks if their motives/agenda went in another direction?
The fact that no one has taken “credit” can mean a number of things, but since the actual anthrax attacks did not turn out to kill huge numbers of people it could be that Al Qaeda did not want to be associated with such a relatively puny attack (let’s remember that they favor big spectacular mass casualty attacks - the anthrax attacks did not turn out to cause the levels of casualties that must have been intended).
The anthrax attacks were horrible enough for those affected but to Al Qaeda (IF they were involved) the anthrax attacks may have appeared to be a failure for not causing nearly enough casualties???? Just trying to imagine the minds of Al Qaeda scum.......