Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This sounds ludicrous in the face of what's actually happening on the ground, but this sort of stuff starts formal, overt wars. If Waziristan is out of control that's one thing, if it's out of control and acting as a sanctuary for covert ops its another, but it's quite another still if it's an open staging area for cross-border raiding including assassination attempts on the neighboring head of state. Pakistan's sovereignty comes to an end at that point.

The real difficulty, of course, is that a Pakistan openly attacked in retaliation might in turn retaliate with nuclear weapons to protect the raiders. That is just how destabilizing an Islamic bomb is, a thing that the people so blandly accepting of Iranian nuclear weapons had better think about.

6 posted on 07/01/2008 2:35:02 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
"The real difficulty, of course, is that a Pakistan openly attacked in retaliation might in turn retaliate with nuclear weapons to protect the raiders. That is just how destabilizing an Islamic bomb is, a thing that the people so blandly accepting of Iranian nuclear weapons had better think about."

Well stated. I to have wondered when an Al Qaida/Taliban nuke (provided by Pakistan of course) will be used in Afghanistan against American forces. I can think it's entirely possible. I'm sure the Pakis will deny providing it to them. We'll have to nuke them back of course. Horrible state of affairs over there.

7 posted on 07/01/2008 3:58:54 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson