Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paulson's Rally: Turning Point for the Market?
Barron's ^ | 9-22-08 | Jim McTague

Posted on 09/21/2008 9:54:08 PM PDT by STARWISE

Special Report: Where to Put Your Money Now -- Experts are encouraged by the government's bailout plan, despite the cost.

* * *

THE GOVERNMENT'S FAR-REACHING PLAN to stem America's financial crisis sent stocks soaring on Friday, perhaps signaling a bottom in this year's vicious bear market.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average shot up 368.75 points on Friday, or 3.4%, on top of a 3.9% jump Thursday, when the bailout surfaced. It was a welcome lift for an index that, earlier in the week, was down 20% for the year.

The plan, which calls for the U.S. Treasury to buy up vast amounts of bad assets from financial institutions, is short on key details, such as the mechanisms for setting prices. But assuming those are worked out sensibly, the move could well help banks and Wall Street firms regain their footing.

The plan is "a big positive," says David Winters, who runs the $1.7 billion Wintergreen Fund. "We're not going to have a depression, and the world was teetering that way."

Also boosting confidence: The Securities and Exchange Commission temporarily banned short-selling of 799 financial stocks, and Treasury proposed to safeguard money-market funds, which have started to suffer from holding debt of troubled financial institutions.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.barrons.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: financialcrisis; financialmarkets; globaleconomy; globalism; paulson
"According to one source who has been in contact with Treasury, the idea is to handle the purchases through a special unit within Treasury, rather than a separate agency like the one created for the S&L crisis, the Resolution Trust Corp.

Treasury, the source says, plans to buy the assets through "reverse auctions," with multiple sellers of a particular type of asset competing for the attention of a single buyer -- Treasury. But even that could leave open the danger of banks stuffing Treasury with assets that are shakier than they appear."

1 posted on 09/21/2008 9:54:09 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BQ91; VegasCowboy; SE Mom; RockinRight

The Road Ahead

Goldman Sachs sees itself as one of the country’s best-run financial companies and its top brass probably shudders at the thought of having to answer to a U.S. regional bank or foreign bank that knows little of its business or culture. Due to the federal actions, Goldman probably will get to preserve its cherished independence. Its shares, which dipped as low as 85 on Thursday, rose 21.80 to 129.80 on Friday

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB122186342294858465.html?mod=ba_mp_view

~~~~

Guess that opinion all changed today.


2 posted on 09/21/2008 9:58:14 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
"that could leave open the danger of banks stuffing Treasury with assets that are shakier than they appear"

That's why the price will be low and the sellers won't have much choice. Treasury already owns the assets of Freddy, Fanny, most of AIG.

When Treasury finishes with its regulations it will be able to name its price.

BTW the $700B+/- will be about 25% or less of the prospective underlying value. Ie., they will be buying about $3T of assets.

yitbos

3 posted on 09/21/2008 10:05:41 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Which is why calling it a “bailout” is silly. These banks and their shareholders have lost a fortune and the taxpayer is going to make a profit by selling those assets over the next few years for much more than the $700B they are putting out in the short term.

This is not the way I’d prefer to see the government use my tax dollars, but I have no doubt it will be a net positive revenue stream for Treasury in the long run.


4 posted on 09/22/2008 12:09:00 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (I used to be Dilbert. Then I was Wally. I retired before I became the Pointy Haired One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
I wonder why so many presume the Democrat Congress will happily pass the Bush plan?

Can anyone explain this naivete?

5 posted on 09/22/2008 12:29:12 AM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789
"Which is why calling it a “bailout” is silly."

What's the #1 maxim of investing?

BUY LOW!!

yitbos

6 posted on 09/22/2008 12:58:56 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: unspun
"Can anyone explain this naivete? "

The big boys flat out told them that, without the plan, the world economy would collapse and . . . . one of them would be reelected.

yitbos

7 posted on 09/22/2008 1:02:00 AM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

>> When Treasury finishes with its regulations it will be able to name its price.

Yes, but the question is, WILL it?

Color me cynical, but when I factor in government incompetence, the cronyism of high finance, and outright greedy corruption, I’m wondering how this will all work out.

I hate to be that way, but unfortunately there’s plenty of evidence that that’s exactly the way our supposed leaders in government and finance take care of business.


8 posted on 09/22/2008 5:29:24 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Because they all have money in the market, too.

This is also a ‘bailout’ for Congress’ portfolio.


9 posted on 09/22/2008 5:30:14 AM PDT by ex 98C MI Dude (All of my hate cannot be found, I will not be drowned by your constant scheming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Paulson is going to destryoy us. An unelected official with way too much power in his hand, gained by scaring the ignorant politicians and public at large.


10 posted on 09/22/2008 7:39:50 AM PDT by Tempest (The devil and the media have sided with Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

I think you guys are all smoking crack if you think the government intends to resale these “investment” anywhere near their value.


11 posted on 09/22/2008 7:42:57 AM PDT by Tempest (The devil and the media have sided with Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson