Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama selects more staff [EMILY's List/AFL-CIO operative named White House Communications Dir.]
The Politico ^ | November 22, 2008 | Mike Allen

Posted on 11/22/2008 4:57:27 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Viking2002
We need to tell 'em, "You look jus' like a hawg." LMAO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Do Tell!!!

Hog Tied Dem

21 posted on 11/23/2008 5:27:54 PM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
So while the Illinois GOP always knew Sauerberg would fail, nobody expected him to fail quite so spectacularly.

I did. Sauerberg's vote % probably matched or exceeded the % of people who even knew who he was. When a nobody runs a non-race against a popular incumbent in a bad year for his party, that's what you get. I didn't expect Berry to do as well as he did but I expected Durbin to exceed his %. He got fewer actual votes though I believe because so many fools vote President only.

Koppie should have ran for the GOP nomination.

22 posted on 11/24/2008 11:55:26 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Well I expected him to get crushed too (every poll showed he was losing by 20+ points), but if talked to virtually every Republican official and voter in the state, they'd all claim we needed to "get behind" Sauerberg because he was within striking distance and could somehow "beat Durbin". Why they assumed this, I don't know, but the numbers show Sauerberg got 1.4 million votes and Koppie (who's far more conservative and far more qualified for the office) got only 23,000. Clearly, most rank-and-file Republicans voted for the RINO instead of the candidate who shared their views because they thought their vote had a chance of unseating Durbin. Instead, all they did is send the GOP a message that it's okay to run more pathetic unqualified RINOs and the party base will rubber stamp them.

The irony here is that the party's 2002 nominee, state Rep. Jim Durkin, is about 5X more conservative than Sauerberg on the issues, but a bunch of conservative activists who whined and moaned about how much they hate Durkin (who's only "bad" position was being a bit weak on second amendment issues) now wanted us to "get behind" empty suit Sauerberg, who was little more than Durbin-lite on the issues. Hmmm.

Some conservatives are their own worse enemy.

23 posted on 11/24/2008 12:20:02 PM PST by BillyBoy (Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson