To: fish hawk
I’m not sure, but wouldn’t there be the force from the bouyancy of the water on a big airplane to consider? The plane could break up and sink like a stone in freezing water.
I heard someone say that swimming in freezing water will make you lose body heat faster than just staying still in the water waiting for rescue.
7 posted on
01/18/2009 11:20:18 AM PST by
donna
(Synonyms: Feminism, Communism, Fascism, Socialism)
To: donna
No matter how you calculate it, taking your chances on a soft landing on water beats hitting buildings and malls etc. any day. With one there is a chance, with the other not only all on board will die but many in the houses and malls will also. I don't see how this would take much thinking. These people were lucky that the Hudson was so conveniently close.
9 posted on
01/18/2009 11:25:13 AM PST by
fish hawk
(Atheism is a non-prophet organization)
To: fish hawk; donna
fish hawk: Duuuhhh. Hit the river or buildings. I never flew a plane in my life but have enough sense to pick the river.
Donna:
.but wouldnt there be the force from the bouyancy of the water on a big airplane to consider? The plane could break up and sink like a stone in freezing water
.I heard someone say that swimming in freezing water will make you lose body heat faster than just staying still in the water waiting for rescue.
Hum
If I had a choice between being a passenger on a jetliner loaded with volatile jet fuel, making a hard landing on concrete in the middle of crowed NYC neighborhood, crashing into buildings, taking out lots of other people on the ground and being engulfed in a huge fire ball or making a somewhat softer landing in the less unobstructed but freezing waters of the Hudson River, Ill take my chances with the river and with hypothermia.
26 posted on
01/18/2009 12:41:08 PM PST by
Caramelgal
(I'm Wacko for Flacco! Go Ravens!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson