"They need more...'tinfoil'...?"
Posted on 03/14/2009 11:09:15 AM PDT by Natural Law
There is a single name that comes up in every attempt to get the Obama Eligibility issue before the Supreme Court, Court Clerk Danny Bickle. The disturbing thing is that I can find no reference to him anywhere other than as a blocking or impeding party in this issue. Does anyone know who this public servant is, what his education and qualifications are to be a Court Clerk with the Supreme Court of the United States? We need to know who paid for his education, what his current income and assets are, and if they are commensurate with his position. We need to find out w recommended and who hired him, when he was hired, how he is able to sabotage court cases, where he passed the bar, what his political affiliations are, etc? Answer these questions and we will have a much better understanding of what is really going on.
ping
bttt
Bump
I am sure he is a non political guy. He was not chosen by the Obama administrtion for sure. Is this something to seriously worry about. A clerk?
"They need more...'tinfoil'...?"
Somebody said a few weeks ago: “We found out more about “Joe The Plumber” in two days than we could about Obama in two years.”
Maybe we need to have someone “Plumb” Danny Bickle?
Think he was the guy in “Taxi Driver”.. No, that was Travis.
Anti-birther’s are losers.
A law clerk is an attorney, usually a top grad from an ivy league school. This is a very, very prestigious position.
“A Clerk?”
Quick, go to: www.therightsideoflife.com and read Dr. Orly Taitz’ Trip Report from yesterday when she confronted Chief Justice Roberts about her “Lightfoot v. Bowen” suit in which “a Clerk” ie. Danny Bickle FAILED to file a supplemental brief for the case around January 23, 2009.
The supplemental brief and the case mysteriously disappeared from the docket for about a day until SCOTUS got hundreds of phone calls asking about it.
She gave Chief Justice an ear full in view of about 5,000 people by way of a live video feed at the University of Idaho.
You mean you're sure that his position is not a political appointment.
Is this something to seriously worry about. A clerk?
There appears to be some evidence that he may be acting like a Praetorian guard without the knowledge of the judges above him of what he and his crew are doing.
If the Supreme Court judges do not observe the work being done under them in the supervisory position, then they are at risk like mushrooms who can be feed crap and kept in the dark.
Ref
“I Did It-Justice Roberts Agreed....”
Ref
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/i-did-it-justice-roberts-agreed-to-read-all-of-my-documents/
Excellent questions indeed.
Can some folks please come up with some serious answers? This question is not a joke.
Thank you.
Is there any video of this encounter with Justice Roberts yesterday?
Correct!
“There are none so blind as those who will not see.”
“Veritas vincit!” Truth WILL conquer... just a matter of time.
The first thing that needs to happen is to find out the correct spelling of his name. See -
ussc "stay clerk" Danny Bickell
ussc "stay clerk" Danny Bickle
“There appears to be some evidence that he may be acting like a Praetorian guard without the knowledge of the judges above him of what he and his crew are doing.
“If the Supreme Court judges do not observe the work being done under them in the supervisory position, then they are at risk like mushrooms who can be feed crap and kept in the dark.”
I agree. You are correct!!!
Nothing really about him on Google.
Funny.Now go play outside will you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.