Posted on 03/25/2009 11:28:02 AM PDT by roaddog727
Obama has put a doomsday device in place, in case he is removed from office, Joe Biden takes over.”
Disagree...
Since Aug 22, when Berg filed the original ( I think) lawsuit over eligiblilty, I have been following this closely.
Based upon numerous posts on this very topic, I have concluded the following:
Biden would NOT automatically inherit the post of President if NObama is declared not eligible. NObama would be perp-walked to the door, and possible arrested for fraud...along with Howard Dean for not properly vetting NObama in the first place. (Then the White House would be fumigated, in my best scenario)
BIDEN was CHOSEN by the DNC and NObama to be NObama’s Vice Presidential candidate. Biden literally rode the coattails of NObama in the Nov 4 election. Biden didn’t stay in the primaries—where voters could have chosen him over NObama.
When the Supremes finally declare NObama not eligible, then both NObama and Biden are out- and a new election would have to be held.
I think there is a SLIGHT chance that the Supremes could declare Biden TEMPORARILY in the OVAL OFFICE until an election could be held, but I suspect IF that happened, Biden would be told not to do or sign anything controversial.
The next large moan we hear would come from Pelosi and Reid...but they both need their wings clipped, also.
I listened...she seems more credible in transcripts. Maybe it is the “breathless” nature of the recording not the facts she presents. I almost stopped listening, thinking her interview was ending, then she launched into the charges beyond the birth certificate.
I guess no one has seen the passport or accessed the records. It is just an American passport could not have been accepted in the year he traveled.....
Thanks for the link. Is there further information on the “lost” paperwork she submitted or her charges against the staff of the SCOTUS?
If your timeline is correct, I might finally have the reason why Hillary did not act on this information before losing in the primary race.”
Bill Clinton was in Africa making appearances with his cronies over the AIDS funds they have raised and Kate Snow- ABC reporterette was on that gig with him. She asked about Clinton being able to support NObama after his wife lost the numbers needed for nomination.
Bill answered—twice—something about ‘he would support ANY candidate that was eligible’...TWICE—and it went over Snow’s head.
It sure caught my ear and eye, tho. Clinton always says something twice when he wants a person to read between the lines, IMO.
You have described part of the Berg problem.
His visits to Kenya, retention there by authorities, and stop in London on the way home, did not convince me that he had information that was definitive. Has he ever released his report?’
You are confused...but it is easy to do so with all the pieces of facts about NObama and his ‘birth’ location.
I don’t believe Berg was the person who went to Kenya and got detained.
I am pretty sure it was Vincent Corsi, and I have not heard yet what he found there. Corsi wrote “the Obama Nation”, and I think he also wrote the book about John f’n Kerry being unfit to serve because of his cowardice in Viet Nam.
Dr. Orly addresses Roberts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9O9usBeg9Y
Dr Orly on G Gordy Liddy:
http://feeds.radioamerica.org/podcast/GGL/audio/Liddy_mon_23-03-09_H1.mp3
YES, that is the way he answered the question. It created a lot of interest later when repeated, but she did not bring out the “crew” to rip 0 to shreds over it.
0 was not blink at the Clinton Machine but I wonder if taking on the Chicago Machine was too DEADLY for her?
I also wonder if the Sec. State job had already been negotiated?
____________________________________________________________________________ Please go to Dr. Orly's website http://defendourfreedoms.us/ and help her any way you can. This lovely little Russian refugee is working herself to exhaustion to save YOUR country. It is reported that she is surviving on 3-4 hours sleep per night and is bearing much of the expense of her lawsuits herself. She is asking for researchers, letter writers, lawyers and other help
Thanks for your clarification too. You did it very kindly!
I was wrong and you might want to read above for some other comments..OK?
-PJ
Boy, if we all work together, we will get all the facts and names straight.
FREEPERS RULE!
Aren't these people in political 'service' and as such; should either 'pay more than their fair share' - or - we just pay them a whole lot less. Altruism is just that. And while Obama makes his appeals to our young citizens to abandon Capitalism, while instead; asking them to embrace the 'service models' of business; seems we should by consequence; demand that he lead the way here; and abandon every and all efforts for 'personal gain'; while President.
(Almost choked last night when he spoke of his being impacted, 'too' by 'charitable giving' tax rate and that this was no big deal. This from a man who NEVER, gave no more than one percent of his earned income; and that was probably high for the Obama's.)
Obama!. . .thy name is Master HYPOCRIT and The 'ONE'. . .Liar Supremo. . .
Oh Lord, now you are really scarring me!
Think about it for a minute. It will be Biden with the same crew that operates Obama's TOTUS.
I hear what you are saying about her breathlessness. I think that was because Steve Malzberg was rushing her along. She is also a fairly recent imigrant from Russia and English is not her native tongue. She is really tenatious and won’t let go. She found ways to get in the faces of Scalia and Roberts after learning that her paperwork was not passed to them as it should have been. After Roberts said he had never heard of the case but indicated he would like to know more, she handed him a second copy of the pleading. Now, both copies of the paperwork have shown up according to the SCOTUS chief security officer and the case will be heard in the preliminary conference.
I pretty much agree. No Pres, no VP.
Re #71
Your astute and perceptive analysis is right on!!!
I thought that today they would list what they would review...are you saying they did accept it to their calendar? (not for trial, but internal consideration and review)
“After Roberts said he had never heard of the case but indicated he would like to know more, she handed him a second copy of the pleading. Now, both copies of the paperwork have shown up according to the SCOTUS chief security officer and the case will be heard in the preliminary conference.”
Sweet. I love to hear the sound of nuts being slowly crushed in a vice.
Woo hoo!
It’s quite complicated. She is asking the Supremes to re-consider Lightfoot vs Bowen and at the same time asking them to force production of documents related to the Easterling vs Obama case. An article describing the strategy that was written right before she successfully got her documents in the hands of SCOTUS is available at:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=4552
In short, it looks like Lightfoot vs Bowen was sabotaged and did not reach Roberts or Scalia for review. She has gotten the ear of Roberts and Scalia who both said they would like to know more. (I’m not sure where this currently sits in the formal protocol). She is using this opportunity to ask SCOTUS to break down a barrier that has been raised by the Attorney General in the Easterling vs Obama case.
One of Berg's cases are marked "under seal". Do you suppose it has anything to do with the fraud named in this report?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.