Criticized for our principles: The New York Times takes on The Washington Times

The Washington Times ^ | August 17, 2009 | Editorial

[Abakumov]

On Friday, the New York Times ran a front-page story about the origins of what they called the "stubborn yet false rumor that President Obama's health care proposals would create government-sponsored 'death panels' to decide which patients were worthy of living." The article listed The Washington Times editorial board as one of the sources of the "death panel" notion. The New York Times noted two of our editorials. Neither of those articles used the expression "death panels."

[Robert A Cook PE]

People are better off ALWAYS reading the Times and Post newspapaers.

(Of course, that IS the Washington Times and New York Post....)

[Kevmo]

NY Lib paper in a food fight with a NY (mostly) Conservative paper. They finally figured out how to sell newspapers. I’m not even in that industry and it has a high duhh factor for me.

[skinkinthegrass]

Criticized for our principles: The New York Times takes on The Washington Times

LL!
Who Knew? .....NYT, has principles...

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

TY Cindy, Lmo56, and Meek for your hard work [which added to this link ping]

I just love this thread. Washtimes smacks Gray Lady with a two-by-four! Yes!

Other news ....

---

RETREAT [?] : White House appears ready to drop ‘public option’

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317303/posts

— but wait ...

---

Sebelius misspoke....Obama still wants public option

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317684/posts

---

Most Democrats are Birthers too:

— The legal requirement — The Presidential Eligibility Act (H.R. 1503)
— Article ll, Section l, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317625/posts

Note Lmo56’s detailed legal summary in post 13:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317625/posts?page=13#13
— O is not a citizen but a DENIZEN? Hm ....

---

Latest on SnoopGate:
White House Concedes Major Garrett Was Correct

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2317611/posts

“Problem is, by the middle of the week Fox News had received thousands of emails complaining that they too were receiving the Axelrod spam.” [snip]

---

RUSH: McCARTHY on Pelosi, the NY Times and the GERMAN NATIONAL SOCIALISTS

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317738/posts

---

FR Warrior Cindy’s Research Thread on Health Care:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308266/posts

[and on post three, her outstanding video collection]

---

Dems abandoning leadership advice

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317421/posts

---

A Duke Professor Explains What the Health Care Bill Actually Says

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2317692/posts

---

[AFPhys]

Our stance on the issue has been consistent, fact-based and principled. Perhaps that is why our editorials have struck a chord. We look forward to continuing to shape the debate on this issue and other critical matters of public policy. We owe nothing less to our loyal readers and to the American people, and we thank the New York Times for calling attention to our work.

---<>---<>---<>---<>---<>---

LOL.... what a great finish! SMACK- take that, NYSlimes. Thanks for the publicity!

Sidebar: this is EXACTLY how SaraCuda ought to handle the OldMedia's and libnuts' criticism.

[TigersEye]

Great post!

[Dante3]

Ditto.