Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago City Council considers abortion protest personal space ordinance
Chicago Tribune ^ | September 30, 2009 | Hal Dardick

Posted on 10/01/2009 1:41:59 PM PDT by KOZ.

Anti-abortion activists would have to respect the personal space of people entering medical facilities in Chicago or risk a $500 fine under an ordinance a City Council committee approved today.

The measure drew criticism from abortion rights opponents and praise from agencies that provide medical services including abortions.

Ald. Thomas Tunney, 44th, said the proposed ordinance, modeled after a Colorado state law upheld in 2000 by the U.S. Supreme Court, is not about the hot-button abortion debate. It’s designed to protect all workers and patients entering any medical facility who could be harassed, intimidated or assaulted, he said.

“What we’re here for today is a personal safety issue,” Tunney said.

The ordinance was proposed by Ald. Vi Daley, 43rd, who said workers and patients going to Near North Health Center, a Planned Parenthood facility in her ward, have complained of conditions outside the facility, which provides women’s health services including abortions.

“Women seeking any kind of medical service are routinely harassed,” she said. “They are photographed, and they are followed.”

The ordinance would establish a 50-foot zone outside the entrances of all health care facilities. Within that zone, no one could come within eight feet of another person, unless given consent, to pass out fliers, display signs, protest verbally, educate or counsel.

Also in the proposed ordinance is a provision that mirrors the federal Freedom of Access Act, which prohibits the use of force, threat of force, physical obstruction or intimidation to block someone from going into or leaving a health care facility. Jeffrey Levine, the city's chief assistant corporation counsel, said the federal provision is included in the local proposal so that city police could enforce it.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: abortion; chicago; plannedparenthood
Peter Breen, executive director of the Thomas More Society Pro-Life Law Center, said the ordinance could prevent people from exercising their 1st Amendment rights to free speech. Many of the anti-abortion rights “counselors” who stand outside Near North, Breen said, are part of a group from the Archdiocese of Chicago who regularly change the minds of women who planned to have abortions. “In just one day, four young women decided to have their children and avail themselves of the services that we offered to them,” he said.

We pray at this clinic every Saturday, and we are affecting their business, so they are trying to ram this through next week.

1 posted on 10/01/2009 1:42:00 PM PDT by KOZ.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

“What we’re here for today is a personal safety issue,” Tunney said.

Irony of galactic proportion.


2 posted on 10/01/2009 1:45:50 PM PDT by muglywump (Seven days without laughter makes one weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

Ought to be a billboard visible from the entrance or parking lot saying

YES YOU CAN keep your baby! Need help? Call [whatever] or visit [whatever].com

As for the “harassment” of women coming “for all kinds of services” they don’t wear tags saying “mammogram” or “abortion.” Most are probably there for “abortion” however. If a woman bent on an abortion wants to get past the “harassers” all she has to do is tell them she’s going there for something else.


3 posted on 10/01/2009 1:48:18 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

“Personal Space?” “Personal Safety Issue?”

In Chicago - the same Chicago that’s experiencing those teen age murders?

Oh, forgot, the Loon’s home town. Murder is a prime option.

Is there (hopefully) a major tectonic fault in Chicago?

Please?


4 posted on 10/01/2009 1:48:23 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muglywump

Black slaves were treated better in antebellum times.


5 posted on 10/01/2009 1:49:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Democrat party is a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.
The measure drew criticism from abortion rights opponents and praise from agencies that provide medical services including abortions.

So pro-lifers are now "abortion rights opponents" while baby butchers are "agencies that provide medical services" that just happen to include abortions. Remind me why mainstream papers are going out of business.

6 posted on 10/01/2009 1:49:02 PM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
So pro-lifers are now "abortion rights opponents" while baby butchers are "agencies that provide medical services"

"Those who control language control minds." Ayn Rand.

7 posted on 10/01/2009 1:53:51 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

What’s truly ironic is that Chicago is the most Catholic city in the country.


8 posted on 10/01/2009 2:05:10 PM PDT by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rum Tum Tugger

These are bubble zones. We have the same thing here in Canada. They are not ‘personal’ by any means, they apply to the abortion clinic.

Clinic bubble zones are contrary to the first amendment.


9 posted on 10/01/2009 2:42:03 PM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

does it apply to every protest or just anti-abortion ones??


10 posted on 10/01/2009 2:43:12 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

All the democrat aldermen— 49 out of 50—accept campaign money from the abortion industry, a sort of bribery that guarantees they will protect this the baby-killing industry from inconvenience. A vile, despicable ordinance from a vile, corrupt gaggle of political hacks.
11 posted on 10/01/2009 3:16:19 PM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: muglywump
“Irony of galactic proportion.”

Exactly. And they site the murder of the abortion doc and ‘escalated violence’, but the violence against women and children in the facility cannot be questioned.

12 posted on 10/01/2009 5:33:00 PM PDT by KOZ.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Right, and since when does “personal space” equal to 50 ft?


13 posted on 10/01/2009 5:34:20 PM PDT by KOZ.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Godwin1

All this from the town that produced pres.dent who was born without birth certificate!


14 posted on 10/01/2009 6:32:47 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson