Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where are the Three Stooges who wrote the 2007 NIE on Iran?
American Thinker ^ | September 30, 2009 | Ed Lasky

Posted on 10/08/2009 7:34:30 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia

Back in 2007, the National Intelligence Estimate was released which all but absolved Iran of suspicions that it was on course to develop nuclear weapons. Rich Lowry writes

In November 2007, US intelligence agencies wrote a National Intelligence Estimate concluding, "We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program." . .

The 2007 NIE had a very circumscribed definition of a weapons program, but it included "covert conversion-related and uranium enrichment-related work." Exactly what Qom is for. What do the Iranians have to do to convince US intelligence they have a weapons program?


The report was widely criticized by even the Europeans. Nevertheless, it gave cover to liberals - including Barack Obama - to downplay the threat from Iran. Now we know that the "secret" enrichment plant at Qom was already known by the intelligence community when the 2007 report was drafted. The report never made mention of that plant, nor seemed to give it any import in the conclusions. The NIE was also criticized as being a hyper-partisan document whose drafting was done by three men who opposed a firm stance towards Iran and had an axe to grind - not with Iran-but with George Bush.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2007; 200710; 200711; 2007nie; iran; irandeal; nie; obama; qom; waronbush
A few weeks old, but I just stumbled upon it and didn't see it posted previously.
1 posted on 10/08/2009 7:34:30 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Was the CIA lying then or now or both times?


2 posted on 10/08/2009 7:36:50 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Back in 2007, the National Intelligence Estimate was released which all but absolved Iran of suspicions that it was on course to develop nuclear weapons

It did no such thing, that was only the spin placed upon it by the democrat/socialist media. What it did say quite clearly was that Iran could build a nuclear weapon within 2-5 years, a window we are now entering.

3 posted on 10/08/2009 7:38:29 AM PDT by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"the NIE's main authors include three former State Department officials"

Since the principals were associated with the State Department, it's clear that they spoke with forked tongues then and now.

4 posted on 10/08/2009 7:39:27 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Still working on their book deals.


5 posted on 10/08/2009 7:40:37 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

With the CIA, anything is possible (likely telling lies all around).


6 posted on 10/08/2009 7:42:34 AM PDT by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
This N.I.E. actually was narrowly focused on the issue of Iran's apparent intention to produce nuclear (or atomic) weapons. The assessment actually was misread to mean Iran's overall intent whereas the assessment actually essentially said that Iran at that time did not intend to take the final step of weaponizing their nuclear capability.

That is, the authors were saying that Iran was, at that time, pausing before taking the final step; not abandoning the overall process. They were, nevertheless, wrong.

7 posted on 10/08/2009 7:43:51 AM PDT by oneolcop (Lead, Follow or Get the hell out of the way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Woo woo woo woo woo woo. Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.


8 posted on 10/08/2009 7:51:58 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Why insult Moe, Larry and Shemp?


9 posted on 10/08/2009 7:56:47 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Another steaming pile from the striped pants crowd at Foggy Bottom.


10 posted on 10/08/2009 8:00:21 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Oh, So you think it is alright to leave Curly out of your list? I ought to bend a pipe over your head and poke you in the eye.....nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!
11 posted on 10/08/2009 8:21:10 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I would like to see these 3 publicly humiliated - either for outright stupidity, or more likely, for playing pure politics with their Civil Servant positions.


12 posted on 10/08/2009 8:33:27 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


13 posted on 10/08/2009 9:27:08 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson