No. The taking of lives in defense of society, in defense of our homes, wives and daughters is legitimate.
The gangs have no legitimacy outside of the warped minds of the members and enablers.
Good points, I like them, thanks
No. The taking of lives in defense of society, in defense of our homes, wives and daughters is legitimate.
The gangs have no legitimacy outside of the warped minds of the members and enablers.
In the 1930s they shot down people like Dillenger, Baby face Nelson, Pretty Boy Floyd, Bonnie and Clyde and others on sight. There was no warning, no negotiations, just shooting them down in the streets like the dogs they were. They didn't have no knock warrants, they didn't break into the wrong homes and shoot people's dogs and kill innocents. The caught the people they were after out in the open and simply shot them. Bank robbery and the indiscriminate killing of innocent bystanders by the robbers in the 1930s came to a screeching halt after that. They were still faced with Prohibition but legalizing booze took care of that.
Two ways to stop this sh** in the states(not just in CA). One: Name the worse gangs and put them on a list. Outlaw them and say that their members will be shot on sight, and then do it. Use roving police patrols to accomplish this. Two: Legalize most drugs, including MJ and cocaine, this will take the money out of it for the gangs and end this crap in a hurry.
Using both these methods quickly and mercilessly would stop this crap right now.