Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Princess Diana 'was killed after plan to frighten her went wrong'
Daily Mail ^ | 8:40 PM on 11th March 2010 | Mail Foreign Service

Posted on 03/11/2010 1:10:12 PM PST by Niuhuru

Princess Diana died after attempts to frighten her into dumping Dodi al Fayed and ending her anti-establishment activities went horribly wrong, a leading lawyer has claimed.

Michael Mansfield claimed he was sure Diana's 'killers' had no intention of ending her life in a Paris tunnel in August 1997 and simply wanted to scare her. But he claimed the operation to torpedo her relationship with Dodi, and silence her planned criticism of the British government over foreign arms sales, backfired spectacularly.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britishroyalfamily; diana; napl; princess; princessdiana; royals; royalty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
I remember reading that Diana idolized Marilyn Monroe and it's quite conincidental that her (Diana's) death, however straightforward, has so many conspiracy theories behind it.
1 posted on 03/11/2010 1:10:13 PM PST by Niuhuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Oooo A “Leading Lawyer” , I just love these “journalist” junk terms

Where are these rankings and what criteria is used to compile these standings?

Who is the Lawyer in second place and what are his/hre odds of taking the lead?

sarc/


2 posted on 03/11/2010 1:16:07 PM PST by DanielRedfoot (What a fool believes, No wise man has the power to reason away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru
It nauseates me to think so many here in America bought into all that Royalty crap. BooHoo, the Princess is dead.

Didn't we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?

3 posted on 03/11/2010 1:16:12 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Why did she get involved with a Muslim in the first place?

Money??


4 posted on 03/11/2010 1:21:54 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, Guts and Guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanielRedfoot

Big red flag for me too. Another is when a TV newsreader prefaces a dig into a guest with, “Some say that....”. It’s a cowardly way to interject one’s own opinion into the discussion while pretending to remain impartial.


5 posted on 03/11/2010 1:22:38 PM PST by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

Historically, things rarely turn out well for members of royal families that dabble in “anti-establishment activity”.


6 posted on 03/11/2010 1:24:48 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Niuhuru

I have always thought the royals were sort of interesting. I actually like the Queen’s Husband, but Diana was even worse than Charles and that is pretty bad.


7 posted on 03/11/2010 1:28:58 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

It nauseates me to think so many here in America bought into all that Royalty crap. BooHoo, the Princess is dead.

Didn’t we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?

How can you say such a thing - Elton John sang a song about it!!! Fart in the Wind or Wind in my fart, or something like that. It was a real touching moment.


8 posted on 03/11/2010 1:32:05 PM PST by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Follow the money! Her Muslim lover sure wasn’t attractive.


9 posted on 03/11/2010 1:33:24 PM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Didn't we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?

Yeah. ...And it looks like we're about to have to fight another one to rid ourselves of those who believe they are "American Royalty".

10 posted on 03/11/2010 1:33:58 PM PST by Ranger Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Historically, things rarely turn out well for members of royal families that dabble in “anti-establishment activity”.


Then how do you explain Prince Charles? Surely his “dabbling” with Camilla before, after, and during his marriage to Diana is “Anti-establishment” to say nothing of his enviro-wacko pontifications,


11 posted on 03/11/2010 1:35:30 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw
I always thought the Royals were nothing more than parasites on true taxpaying citizens. Worse, many of the Royals were arrogant and condescending to their subjects and indulged in degenerate behavior.
12 posted on 03/11/2010 1:37:35 PM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Maybe she checked his package.


13 posted on 03/11/2010 1:39:28 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DanielRedfoot

This lawyer jumped out to an early lead after the rest got stuck behind an ambulance.


14 posted on 03/11/2010 1:39:44 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Truthers to the Left of me, Birthers (pretending to be) to the Right of me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw

“Wind in my farting tramp” (if IIRC)


15 posted on 03/11/2010 1:40:49 PM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

>It nauseates me to think so many here in America bought into all that Royalty crap. BooHoo, the Princess is dead.
>
>Didn’t we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?

Ah, don’t go there. Royalty is not, in itself, a bad thing; remember that Hitler’s power sprang up from a free election [at first] while Wenceslaus WAS a royal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wenceslaus_I,_Duke_of_Bohemia

Granted, I would rather people be famous for their “good deeds” like Mother Theressa was... so popular that she stopped a battle [or, rather God used her to] with her mere presence when the attacker was not willing to assault the city because they did not want her to be collateral damage.


16 posted on 03/11/2010 1:41:22 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
She was a beautiful woman and her motives were right, but her dalliance with that damn Muslim was unforgivable.

The Royal Family, Queen Betty, her brain-dead Prince and their mentally challenged son, as well as most of thier cousins and kin are really a bunch of low-lives themselves.

Dysfunctional Human Beings.

Now that most Christians in Britain are Catholic, maybe they can bring back the Stuarts and kick the Hanoverians out of office.

They could hardly be worse, and might be actually an improvement.

17 posted on 03/11/2010 1:45:43 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, Guts and Guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
"Then how do you explain Prince Charles? Surely his “dabbling” with Camilla before, after, and during his marriage to Diana is “Anti-establishment” to say nothing of his enviro-wacko pontifications..."

It's 2010. Sexual license and greenism are the establishment.

18 posted on 03/11/2010 1:47:09 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

I think Diana was dedicated to a fantasy that would never exist. I don’t think people understood what Charles went through when he lived with Diana. Knowing what I know now about her, I think she was a lot like Marilyn in the sense that Marilyn seemed content to be a victim than someone who took control and made the best of any situation she found herself in.

I don’t think the RF wanted Diana out, but to settle in and live up to her responsibilities.


19 posted on 03/11/2010 1:47:46 PM PST by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

I think she did it to thumb her nose at the RF and also live a luxe life. Two birds with one stone.


20 posted on 03/11/2010 1:48:27 PM PST by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson