Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin; rabscuttle385; AuntB; stephenjohnbanker; mkjessup; Bokababe; genetic homophobe; ...

I have been thinking along similar lines. The spending is not for another four years. Let’s say for argument Obama wins in 2012 worst case. It’s is still up to that future congress to fund it. This two year group of congress democrats, many wont be here, cant fund it or any other program in the future now. Next is mandates. The future congress if not sooner can send Obama a bill removing mandates , assuming they even hold up in court. What if Obama vetos that? Then he acts out against voters and Republicans can run on that. Most likely the Senate filibusters the removal to hide it from public. Then add it to unemployment benefits.

The weak link in my plan ?? Elected republicans! Count on them to spend if they get power again.


3 posted on 03/25/2010 6:48:42 PM PDT by sickoflibs (( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

We still have to pay in premiums? What do you do about those? That’s the idea. Take our money.


6 posted on 03/25/2010 7:37:21 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: sickoflibs

Remember no matter what Obama or others say; he was really not elected. He was selected.


7 posted on 03/25/2010 7:37:53 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson