Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's behind the anti-Tea Party hate narrative?
Washington Examiner ^ | April 20, 2010 | Byron York

Posted on 04/20/2010 11:17:22 AM PDT by neverdem

(AP File)

There's a new narrative taking hold in the wake of the recent Tea Party protests and the 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing: The Tea Partiers' intense opposition to the Obama administration has led to overheated political rhetoric, which could in turn lead to violence, perhaps as devastating as Oklahoma City.

Former President Clinton is the leading voice of this new narrative. In newspaper interviews, television appearances and a widely discussed speech Friday, Clinton said it's "legitimate" to draw "parallels to the time running up to Oklahoma City and a lot of the political discord that exists in our country today."

"Watch your words," warned ABC News, reporting that Clinton "weighed in on the angry anti-government rhetoric, ringing out from talk radio to Tea Party rallies."

The reports dovetailed with earlier media stories depicting Tea Party gatherings as angry mobs, accusing protesters of throwing racial epithets at black lawmakers and of making threats of violence. The implication was that all this could be part of a nationwide trend. "Just this month, the Southern Poverty Law Center reported that it had tracked an explosion in extremist anti-government patriot groups fueled, in large part, by anger over the economy and Barack Obama's presidency," NBC's David Gregory said on "Meet the Press" in early April. "In this highly charged political atmosphere, where you've got so much passion, so much disagreement, this takes it, of course, to a different level."

How did this story line grow? Many of the claims that extremism is on the rise in America originate in research done by the Southern Poverty Law Center, an Alabama-based group that for nearly 40 years has tracked what it says is the growing threat of intolerance in the United States. These days the SPLC is issuing new warnings of new threats. But today's warnings sound an awful lot like those of the past.

In 1989, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of skinheads, saying, "Not since the height of Klan activity during the civil rights era has there been a white supremacist group so obsessed with violence. ..."

In 1992, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of other white supremacist groups, which it claimed had grown by 27 percent from the year before.

In 1995, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of right-wing militias.

In 1998, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of Internet-based hate groups, which according to one press account had "created the biggest surge in hate in America in years."

In 1999, the SPLC warned that the growing threat of Web-based hate groups was growing even more, with a 60 percent increase from the year before.

In 2002, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of post-Sept. 11 hate groups, which it said had grown 12 percent between 2000 and 2001.

In 2004, the SPLC warned (again) of the growing threat of skinhead groups, whose numbers it said had doubled in the previous year.

In 2008, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of hate groups overall, whose number it said increased 48 percent since 2000.

And in 2010, just a few weeks ago, the SPLC warned of the growing threat of "patriot" groups, which it said increased by 244 percent in 2009.

In the world of the Southern Poverty Law Center, the threat is always growing. Ronald Reagan's policies led to a growing threat. The first Gulf War led to a growing threat. The election of Bill Clinton led to a growing threat. The Internet led to a growing threat. Sept. 11 led to a growing threat. The war in Iraq led to a growing threat. Is it any wonder that Obama's presidency has, in the SPLC's estimation, led to a growing threat?

Hate groups do exist across the political spectrum, and have for a long time. But they have nothing to do with the expressions of frustration over deficits, taxes and Obamacare that we have heard at so many Tea Party gatherings. That frustration, felt by Republicans, independents and even some Democrats, is an entirely mainstream reaction to the sharply activist course the president and congressional leadership have taken. While the level of frustration is indeed a threat, it is a political threat. Ask Democrats running in this November's elections.

It's important to distinguish between a political threat and a physical one. As Clinton might say, the hate accusers should watch their words.

Byron York, the Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: alinsky; alinskyparty; brownshirts; clinton; clintontruthfile; democratcorruption; democrats; fascism; liberalfascism; liberalhate; liberalprogressivism; reichstaggers; splc; splcbrownshirts; teaparty; teapartyexpress; teapartymovement; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
How Clinton exploited Oklahoma City for political gain
1 posted on 04/20/2010 11:17:22 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Liberals fear exposure more than anything. They know that the majority of the American people will not allow them to make us slaves. Their SOP is to discredit those exposing them because they can’t dispute the truth.


2 posted on 04/20/2010 11:20:27 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Ya know, the liberals are the ones who are inciting violence and racist hate. They race bait anything and everything. They play the class war fare to the extreme and we end up with anarchist beating the crap out of Republicans in New Orleans.

The Democrats and liberals need to be held accountable for the racism, hate and violence that they constantly incite!!!

3 posted on 04/20/2010 11:21:21 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Bump!


4 posted on 04/20/2010 11:21:34 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Help Sarah Palin! go to - http://www.conservatives4palin.com - You know what to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
SPLC

Yawn.

5 posted on 04/20/2010 11:21:54 AM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

I used to post on Yahoo as

“expose the left”.

Drove libs NUTS. They know that all it takes to defeat them is for someone to tell the truth about them and their agenda.


6 posted on 04/20/2010 11:22:09 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well there haven’t been any explosions so far.


7 posted on 04/20/2010 11:22:45 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good article. Thanks, neverdem.


8 posted on 04/20/2010 11:22:50 AM PDT by MizSterious ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Maybe because the Tea Party features guns and hates the government worries people?


9 posted on 04/20/2010 11:24:11 AM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

We’re being set up for something, folks, and it won’t be pleasant. Our erstwhile masters are getting nervous. They are monsters, all of them. They will do monstrous things in order to secure their hold on power. History is my witness.


10 posted on 04/20/2010 11:25:15 AM PDT by Noumenon ("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“What's behind the anti-Tea Party hate narrative?”

The White House, the DNC and their sleazy operatives in Congress and the news media.

11 posted on 04/20/2010 11:25:20 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It is important to be aware that the reason the TEA Party is being accused of being racist is because that was how the Federal beast successfully assassinated the previous States Right movement(Dixiecrats) in 1948.

History does tend to repeat..and success requires a full and thorough understanding of previous failures.

http://www.alabamamoments.state.al.us/sec54.html


12 posted on 04/20/2010 11:25:28 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And Rush’s reply was “Don’t screw with me.”. Love it.


13 posted on 04/20/2010 11:25:35 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

We The People are far smarter than these enemies of our freedom. Always be one step ahead of your enemies at all times.


14 posted on 04/20/2010 11:26:08 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Clean the RAT/RINO Sewer in 2010 and 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

“We’re being set up for something, folks, and it won’t be pleasant. Our erstwhile masters are getting nervous. They are monsters, all of them. They will do monstrous things in order to secure their hold on power. History is my witness.”

The left knows it is their people and the special interest groups they protect who are violent. They know the left will and does cause violence. They want someone to blame when it happens.


15 posted on 04/20/2010 11:27:03 AM PDT by AuntB (WE are NOT a nation of immigrants! We're a nation of Americans! http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I believe the Democratic Party is behind it, starting with the DNC and the White House.


16 posted on 04/20/2010 11:29:55 AM PDT by popdonnelly (I'm so old, I remember when free enterprise was praised, and communism was shunned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

“We The People are far smarter than these enemies of our freedom. Always be one step ahead of your enemies at all times.”

We’ll find out in November.


17 posted on 04/20/2010 11:31:17 AM PDT by Soothesayer (The United States of America Rest in Peace November 4 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

SPLC has been around quite a long while.

Do we have less poverty or just more laws?


18 posted on 04/20/2010 11:31:32 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Proof that Tea Partiers tote guns and hate the government, please.


19 posted on 04/20/2010 11:31:34 AM PDT by popdonnelly (I'm so old, I remember when free enterprise was praised, and communism was shunned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Outright character assassination. The same sort of abuse the Sarah Palin has been subjected to since the summer of 2008 when she was named as McCain’s VP pick.

I’m not talking about attacks on her experience or lack thereof or even her political views.

Calling her a C***, B****, saying her baby should have been aborted, saying her daughter is a slut while championing the no count gay porno mag posing dude who knocked her up. It’s the same as BDS (Bush Derangement Syndrome).

There is no rationalizing with an irrational mind. The same liberal elites who decried the HCUAA investigations as “hysteria” and a “witchhunt” now engage in a hysteria driven witchhunt of “teabaggers”. The madness of crowds has been well researched. The DUmasses are being manipulated. Tell them they are the “cool kids” and that it is okay to make fund of the “retards”. Obama, Kerry, and Clinton all were street protesting agitators yet now they decry anyone who would stand up to their agendas.

I don’t know where Sarah Palin or GW Bush found the strength to endure the attacks. I expect it as a Christian, the history of that goes back 2000 years. But this level of partisan smear via DNC/Media collusion is a recent turn of events. They seek to intimidate the voters who might oppose them at the polls.

Someone needs to ask Bill Clinton why he has returned to his tactic of the Politics of Personal Destruction.


20 posted on 04/20/2010 11:32:43 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (We've gone from phony soldiers to phony conservative protesters. Nothing about liberalism is genuine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson