Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

X-37B Launch (Live Thread)
Patrick Air Force Base ^ | April 22, 2010

Posted on 04/22/2010 4:29:20 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: KevinDavis

big bump


21 posted on 04/22/2010 5:15:17 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
to launch an Atlas V Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle
If it has evolved, why isn't it called an Atlas VI? ;')
22 posted on 04/22/2010 5:28:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Because it is still evolving. Rocket evolution is never-ending process.


23 posted on 04/22/2010 5:35:25 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Funny, I always thought it was intelligent design.


24 posted on 04/22/2010 6:07:45 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (NEW TAG ====> **REPEAL OR REBEL!** -- Islam Delenda Est! -- Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine; neverdem; patton

Right. It (the Atlas) has “evolved” since I built a model of it back in 1966....

By the way, it’s based on technology older than Mercury, the B-52, and V-2 (er, Army Jupiter) missile.

You’d think NASA could have developed something newer since a 1958-1960 ICBM first flew. Now, I’ll contrast that with what our engineers and NASA’s EREAL engineers developed in the 1960’s when they were really “rocket scientists” .... and all that implied.

The Atlas really shows more that the US government hasn’t thought of anything new/bought anything new in the last 50 years.


25 posted on 04/22/2010 6:09:39 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

You would think that since it was intelligently designed they would call it the

Atlas V Intelligently Designed Expendable Launch Vehicle.


26 posted on 04/22/2010 6:14:14 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
The Atlas really shows more that the US government hasn’t thought of anything new/bought anything new in the last 50 years.

You're being silly.

Comparing the Atlas V of today to that of 1950 is like comparing a modern Ford F150 pickup to a 1950 Ford F150 pickup.

The name is the same, but that's about all that's the same.

27 posted on 04/22/2010 6:17:52 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

It has Russian RD-180 engines being used in them since about 2002.


28 posted on 04/22/2010 6:18:09 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

29 posted on 04/22/2010 6:24:29 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

30 posted on 04/22/2010 6:26:14 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
They had an article about the X37-B in this months issue of Popular Mechanics. Interesting stuff . . . although it was claimed that this will be the first unmanned space-plane to complete an orbital mission . I thought that feat had already been accomplished by the Buran.
31 posted on 04/22/2010 6:29:46 PM PDT by TheVitaminPress (as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

Nice launch. The rumble went on for a long time.


32 posted on 04/22/2010 8:42:41 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("The real death threat is their legislation" Rush Limbaugh, 3/25/10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

There’s not really anything left of the old Atlas in an Atlas V except the name “Atlas”. The Atlas 2 was the last of the family to retain elements of the original Atlas. The Atlas III went to the Russian RD-180 engines, and from that point on it’s pretty much just been a name.

The newer Atlases go something like this:
Atlas I—developed from the Atlas G, incorporating improvements from other “classic” Atlases and some improvements of its own.

Atlas II—Uprated MA-5 engine (MA-5A), stretched tanks. Old vernier engines replaced with new hydrazine models.

Atlas III-practically clean sheet design around RD-180s. Still uses balloon tanks, last vestige of classic Atlas in it. This model didn’t really draw any customers.

Atlas IV-there is no Atlas IV. Maybe there was one on paper at one point, but only the III and V saw daylight.

Atlas V-RD-180s with new tanks in a clusterable design. Nothing really left of the old Atlas but the nameplate.


33 posted on 04/22/2010 9:01:43 PM PDT by saundby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ronaldus Magnus

“various experiments and allow satellite sensors, subsystems, components and associated technology”

It is a secret mission.

Speculation?

How about technology that permits hearing people’s conversations on earth?


34 posted on 04/22/2010 9:03:18 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saundby

Hmmn. Russian engines under a US “nameplate”, eh?

Thanks for the update.


35 posted on 04/23/2010 7:25:38 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

The Russians couldn’t sell the rockets without a Western partner. They started working with Aerojet about 15 years ago to get them in usable condition by our standards, and have Aerojet do the testing to prove it. They were workable engines, though the condition of them was initially pretty shocking by our standards.

Since Titan is history, it’s worked out well for Aerojet. PWR is still selling RJ-10s, though having to do two types of it (one for Delta IV, another for Atlas V), which drives up their costs.


36 posted on 04/25/2010 11:42:21 PM PDT by saundby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson