Well, the allegations both involve “The Lewinsky”, which as we now know is the preferred sex act by powerful politicians (although under The Clinton Rule, oral sex isn’t “sex”).
The question is a simple one that any guy (or gal) should be able to answer: "Why would Cain (or any man) push a woman's head into his lap?"
I can think of only one reason - the previously mentioned "Lewinsky". Now as anyone knows in order for that maneuver to be performed the man in question would have to unzip his pants. Someone I know told me that even then, the task is awkward and accomplishing it is expedited by unbuckling the belt and the waist band of said pants.
Now I ask you:"If such an incident had really occurred and had it honestly inflicted a measurable degree of emotional damage would not the act of a man opening his trousers have been one of the most indelible parts of her recollection?"
I believe it would and I believe it would have been an important part of her story. For the record, two women I have talked candidly with about this agree. They also agree that they would have been specific about the details of the encounter when telling their boyfriend about it.
I have a problem with another comment made about this. It has been widely publicized that the Bialik woman met, hugged and talked with Herman Cain at a Tea party event just a month ago. Yet, Cain stated in his presser today that when he saw her on TV he had never seen her before. I think there's a bit of a hole in that one, too.