Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

I can believe if Karl Marx were alive today, he would join the Tea Party
Trolling?

If you think Marx would back off on his dream of centralization, think again.
4 posted on 11/21/2011 9:46:53 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

It was a different century then. A scientist has to conform to the facts, not to theory. The ironic point is the Left of course is nothing like the theory predicted and instead of being oppressed, the proletarians enjoy a higher standard of living and more freedom than ever before! Any serious study of our modern life would lead to this conclusion. We’re not living in the 19th Century anymore and the Communist Manifesto is no longer an accurate description of existing social reality. So yes, I can believe the scientist would have to change his views. One must discover the facts from life. Its the basis of the scientific method.


7 posted on 11/21/2011 9:53:01 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
If you think Marx would back off on his dream of centralization, think again.

Exactly. Advice to the clueless:

1) Marx lied.

2) He lied for the rich, because the bourgeois middle class was growing to happy successful, powerful and free.

3) He lied so that stupid young people would attack their own families and destroy their own countries in the name of defeating the rich, so that the rich would not be threatened by the happy middle class.

4) That explains the "mystery" of communist billionares like Soros, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, and their millionaire enablers like Clinton, Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein and the rest of Congress.

11 posted on 11/21/2011 11:27:40 PM PST by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Yes, Karl Marx would back off his initial thesis, based on 19th century London, because it is no longer the 19th century and he was never stupid...just unnerved by the beginnings of the Industrial Revolution...he would have been the first to have admitted that he was wrong as a soothsayer. Flame me now my comrades.


12 posted on 11/21/2011 11:41:41 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (Obama is just the symptom of what is destroying the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson