thank you... didn't even lose his clearance!
Posted on 12/18/2011 8:14:08 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
I took the statement to be about “the instability of flaming fagots and the PC requirements imposed on the US Military.”
Yea Im waiting
Peyton or Eli? Yes they are great.
Iirc she was a NCO.
thank you... didn't even lose his clearance!
Hang him in public!
‘I took the statement to be about “the instability of flaming fagots and the PC requirements imposed on the US Military.”’
I agree with your statement but really want to see what stockpirate has to say since he/she/it posted the article.
{{{CRICKETS}}}
drama queen == homosexual
You've kept us in suspense long enough...
Praise of evidently treasonous activities on this conservative site does not meet any minimal standard of rationality, absent some detailed and convincing explanation.
Unless you care to explain why releases of thousands of classified docs which caused enormous problems for our military and diplomats across numerous countries is a “service to freedom” thoughtful people will conclude that you are neither serious nor respectable in making such hit-and-run remarks.
It would not be any plausible argument merely to cite a few items of info that you think are good to have in the public arena. The beginnings of a plausible argument would need to justify the entirety of the release plus justify a principle that it’s permissible to violate all document classifications when you (the individual) think it might be good to do so.
If he had struck a superior like they say, I’m pretty sure that there would have been, at the very least, Article 15 proceedings placed against him.
But there is no mention of that. Which is very fishy.
My goodness he’s a walking sterotype.
Check out the second courtroom sketch included in that article. It looks like the artist was trying to have a little fun at the traitor's expense.
I think it’s something that rhymes with “stock” that he’s a pirate of......
Manning faces charges including aiding the enemy, which carries life imprisonment.
He should be shot on National TV..
That was my first reaction, especially when the reporting just flew right over it like it was commonplace.
Maybe the female superior just whipped his ass.
Been known to happen. That avoids the article 15 for both the subordinate and superior.
And maintains good order and discipline.
No fighting in the war room.
“If he had struck a superior like they say, I’m pretty sure that there would have been, at the very least, Article 15 proceedings placed against him. But there is no mention of that. Which is very fishy.”
You got that right.
Could it be they were already investigating him for treason?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.