Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy Department prepares to approve more green loans
The Hill ^ | April 5, 2012 | Andrew Restuccia

Posted on 04/05/2012 3:15:15 PM PDT by jazusamo

The Energy Department said Thursday it expects to begin tentatively approving new taxpayer-backed loans for renewable energy projects in the coming months.

The announcement comes about seven months after Solyndra, the California solar firm that received a $535 million loan guarantee from the administration in 2009, went bankrupt, setting off a firestorm in Washington.

“The Department expects to begin issuing conditional commitments over the next several months after completing a rigorous internal and external review of each application,” Energy Department loan program chief David Frantz wrote to the top lawmakers on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

Frantz – in the letter to committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) and ranking Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) – stressed that projects receiving loan guarantees will be “subject to a robust monitoring effort to ensure that taxpayers’ investments are protected.”

He defended the loan program from GOP critics, who have alleged that the administration is wasting taxpayer money by supporting risky renewable energy projects.

“By any measure, the Energy Department’s loan programs have helped the United States keep pace in the fierce global race for clean energy technologies,” Frantz wrote.

“Over the past three years the loan programs have invested in some of the world’s biggest, most innovative, and most ambitious clean energy projects to date, supporting a balanced portfolio of American clean energy projects that are creating tens of thousands of jobs nationwide and are expected to provide power to nearly three million U.S. households,” he said.

The Energy Department sent separate letters Thursday to the developers of more than three-dozen projects in the loan guarantee pipeline. The letters outlined the department’s criteria for identifying which projects will ultimately receive the loan guarantees.

Projects that meet a set of initial criteria will then be prioritized based on their ability to create new jobs and support manufacturing supply chains, among other things. The top projects will then be subject to the department’s “rigorous due diligence and loan underwriting review,” according to the letter.

“Please be advised that regardless of your project’s characteristics with respect to the screening and/or prioritization criteria, there can, of course, be no assurance that we will be able to consider your project for a conditional commitment, that appropriated funds will be available for your project, or that it will ultimately receive a conditional commitment or loan guarantee,” the letter warns.

An Energy Department spokesman said it is “impossible to project” how many projects will receive loan guarantees under the program.

Many of the projects in the pipeline did not receive backing under an Energy Department loan program that expired last September. They are now eligible for loan guarantees under a separate program that backs innovative clean energy projects.

The 1703 program, as it is known, received $170 million under last April’s budget agreement to cover credit subsidy costs associated with each loan guarantee. The credit subsidy cost is based on the risk of a project defaulting on its loan. The budget agreement set aside an additional $1.5 billion for projects that pay their own credit subsidy costs.

The news that the Energy Department will again issue renewable energy loan guarantees is certain to draw the attention of House Republicans, who are investigating the loan program.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee has spent more than a year probing the Solyndra loan guarantee, using the bankruptcy to raise broader questions about the Obama administration's clean energy investments.

Committee Republicans have alleged that the department missed a series of red flags that hinted at Solyndra’s financial problems. And they’ve accused the administration of approving the loan to please Obama’s campaign donors, a claim the White House strongly denies.

The committee’s investigation has not uncovered evidence of political influence. But the probe has unearthed details that are likely embarrassing and potentially politically damaging for the White House, including that officials questioned the wisdom of approving the Solyndra loan guarantee.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corruption; cronycapitalism; doe; greenenergy; guaranteedloans; obama
And they’ve accused the administration of approving the loan to please Obama’s campaign donors, a claim the White House strongly denies.

Obama and his WH thugs still lie. They're determined to throw more taxpayer dollars down a toilet.

Fed Audit Confirms Govt. Corruption In Solyndra Deal

1 posted on 04/05/2012 3:15:28 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

obama equals unlimited government

bumper sticker

‘who’s your daddy’


2 posted on 04/05/2012 3:23:28 PM PDT by Undecided 2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“....a rigorous internal and external review of each application”.

Which means, how soon the proposed monetary assistance will be turned around and be flowing into Obama’s re-election campaign coffers.

The grifters are ALL taking a cut.

Virtually none of the money shall go to actually producing a product that anyone will purchase.

A highly unlikely business plan at best. Most probably intentionally set up to fail, then of course, there are “liquidation” procedures, which consist mostly of picking over the remains before any legal authorities arrive.

If they ever do.


3 posted on 04/05/2012 3:33:46 PM PDT by alloysteel (It is hard to get a man to understand, when his pay depends upon his not understanding something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Which means, how soon the proposed monetary assistance will be turned around and be flowing into Obama’s re-election campaign coffers.

You nailed it with that and the rest of your post!

4 posted on 04/05/2012 3:39:36 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

5 posted on 04/05/2012 3:40:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (Character assassination is just another form of voter fraud: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ah, more money laundering just like the companies like BP they use to do money laundering. Americans who believe Obama and this government are going to do anything for them are fools and will probably end up as sacrifices which they have to do to keep the people under control. I hope they realize people like Obama only want real slave labor. They have to control by fear; so don’t be surprised if you see Obama supporters sacrificed.


6 posted on 04/05/2012 5:23:04 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
fierce global race for clean energy technologies

WHAT FIERCE GLOBAL RACE???????? This is not a first-one-to-the-moon-gets-bragging-rights kind of affair. What goes wrong if we "come in second" or "third"?

7 posted on 04/05/2012 7:47:58 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "If Greece has been knocking back the ouzo, we're face down in the vat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Dear God guide us!!!


8 posted on 04/05/2012 7:49:26 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Check out my blog for more Obama outrages: The Obama Clarifier http://obamaclarifier.blogspot.com/


9 posted on 04/05/2012 8:36:24 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson