Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Labor Dept. withdraws farm child labor rule one day after Daily Caller report goes viral
Daily Caller ^ | 4/26/12 | Paul Conner

Posted on 04/26/2012 6:06:03 PM PDT by Nachum

Under pressure from farming advocates in rural communities, and following a report by The Daily Caller, the Obama administration withdrew a proposed rule Thursday that would have applied child labor laws to family farms.

Critics complained that the regulation would have drastically changed the extent to which children could work on farms owned by family members. The U.S. Department of Labor cited public outcry as the reason for withdrawing the rule.

“The decision to withdraw this rule — including provisions to define the ‘parental exemption’ — was made in response to thousands of comments expressing concerns about the effect of the proposed rules on small family-owned farms,” the Department said in a press release Thursday evening. “To be clear, this regulation will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration.”

The rule would have dramatically changed what types of chores children under the age of 16 could perform on and around American farms. It would have prohibited them from working with tobacco, operating almost all types of power-driven equipment and being employed to work with raw farm materials.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beanpickers; child; childlabor; dailycaller; dept; familyfarms; farm; jerrymoran; johnthun; labor; labordept; viral
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
Obama and Agenda 21
1 posted on 04/26/2012 6:06:11 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 04/26/2012 6:07:06 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Li’l Bammy getting ANOTHER lesson on his endless stupidity.


3 posted on 04/26/2012 6:12:34 PM PDT by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Labor Dept. withdraws WH garden child-Obummer labor rule one day after Moochie goes viral


4 posted on 04/26/2012 6:12:51 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (Obummer in Wh garden?! Who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Color me skeptical.

Are they suspending the rule, or only refusing to enforce it on “family” farms?

The reason I am skeptical is because a good many “family” farms are indeed incorporated, even though they are really and truly family farms.

I bet the fedgov enforces this crap on the incorporated family farms.

Families have been running farms in this country for over 200 years. There is no reason (that is not nefarious) for the Feds to pass any such laws this late in the game.


5 posted on 04/26/2012 6:13:56 PM PDT by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Obama will have more flexibility in a 2nd term. He won’t need laws. His pet agencies will just make any rules they(he) wants.


6 posted on 04/26/2012 6:17:26 PM PDT by umgud (No Rats, No Rino's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Federal gubermint has run amok and this started long before the Obama administration. They are simply taking it to extremes and thereby illustrating the problem with their absurdity.

What is the Constitutional basis for such a rule? without a doubt it will be said to fall under the poor, tortured Commerce Clause. It is time for a clarifying amendment to return our Country to sanity and power back to the States.

7 posted on 04/26/2012 6:17:38 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (SpaceX Dragon launch to ISS, Cape Canaveral AFS, May 7, 9:38 AM EDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I am surprised and don’t believe this is a permanent plan for them!’


8 posted on 04/26/2012 6:18:33 PM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eat my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
“To be clear, this regulation will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration.”

"To be clear" seems to be the BHO administration's favorite phrase. I am skeptical of everything they do. They withdrew it because of public opinion, or it was all orchestrated from the beginning to make it look like they are willing to be kind of enough to "give" us some of our rights and freedoms back--as if they ever had the power to take them away to begin with?

9 posted on 04/26/2012 6:21:33 PM PDT by Elvina ( crimethink - To even consider any thought not in line with the principles of Ingsoc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Deferred until next year.


10 posted on 04/26/2012 6:21:44 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This ridiculous incursion into American farm life was born out of 0bama and his socialist followers believing (deeply) that they know best what is good for all of us. This was about control, like 99% of the other crap he and his minions have foist on the American people.
The simple truth is that this country would be in much better shape if the values that drive American family farms were incorporated across the social fabric of America.
Hard work doesn’t deprive young people of their youth. It builds their character to face adulthood better prepared to rely on themselves and take responsibility for their own successes and their own failures.
The work ethic of the American family farm is one that clearly demonstrates that achievement comes with effort, and that difficulties can be overcome without having to rely on the handouts of government.

0bama needs to be thrown out on his ear, along with the socialists he brought along for this trampling of the US Constitution and the American way of life.


11 posted on 04/26/2012 6:21:52 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Is it OK for my kids to finish cutting the grass?


12 posted on 04/26/2012 6:22:28 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (The best is the enemy of the good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
Families have been running farms in this country for about 10,000 years ~ maybe more.

Agricultural endeavor is as ancient here as anywhere.

This Solis gal is a known Commie. Apparently she's among the stupid commies because even the Chicoms have given up on the commune model.

13 posted on 04/26/2012 6:24:03 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The nannies have no backbone, except when they smell the taste of the raw power they crave. But never fear, this outrageous proposal will be back, maybe in different clothes, but the craven socialists will never stop trying.


14 posted on 04/26/2012 6:26:14 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Not so fast. From Farm safety expert: Know what's in proposed child labor law

"While the Agricultural Hazardous Occupations Order was written in an effort to protect children from dangerous situations, it could prevent many young people from working on family farms or participating in agriculture-related educational programs.

Under the proposed changes, the "parental exemption" itself would not apply to incorporated family farms, Field noted.

"Many small, family farms are incorporated because of the tax advantages," he said. "But when a farm is incorporated, parents are considered a corporate entity and they would not be covered by the parental exemption."

Field said that due to negative feedback from producer groups, the U.S. Department of Labor has appeared to back off of this provision as it relates to incorporated farms. However, he said there has yet to be a published revision."


15 posted on 04/26/2012 6:28:21 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Farm land is currently an investment opportunity. A government rule that >increases farming costs may put more family farms on the market.
A lot of things done under the guise of ‘the government is here to help you’ are really just opportunities for politicians&cronies to make money.


16 posted on 04/26/2012 6:28:58 PM PDT by gghd (A Pro-life Palinista & a member of the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!


17 posted on 04/26/2012 6:31:06 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell. Signed, a fanatic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

King: Obama Administration Finally Caves on Youth Farm Labor

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Washington, DC- Congressman Steve King (R-IA) released the following statement today after the Department of Labor announced that it will withdraw its proposed rule to prohibit young people from working on family farms and participating in agriculture education programs including Future Farmers of America and 4-H.

“Once again President Obama’s overreaching policies have outraged the American people,” said King. “I’m happy to see the backlash surrounding this rule has prompted the Department of Labor to withdraw the proposed rule. The Department of Agriculture collaborated with the Department of Labor on this direct assault of American family farms. Family farms are the core of American culture, and for centuries they have played a large role in instilling a strong work ethic in young people. I know because I raised my three sons in rural Iowa and taught them the value of hard work.”

“I’m pleased to have had the support of many farm families as I’ve worked to oppose this rule in order to ensure that young people will still have the same opportunities. This policy was not only unnecessary, it threatened the very way of life that I and so many others hold dear. When will President Obama realize that his out of touch policies do not reflect the values of the American people? His actions continue to show that he is disconnected with the people in the heartland of this great country.”

###

http://www.steveking.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4399&Itemid=300099


18 posted on 04/26/2012 6:33:03 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Willard Romney, purveyor of the world's finest bullmitt. | FR Class of 1998 |)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Before this, there was this:

Comment from Hilda Solis, Secretary of Labor last summer:


19 posted on 04/26/2012 6:35:46 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elvina
“To be clear, this regulation will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration.”

The Obama "administration" ends Jan of 2013 regardless of whether he wins or loses. We are the only ones who can ensure that it's not replaced with the Obama "era of flexibility"

20 posted on 04/26/2012 6:36:14 PM PDT by Mygirlsmom (The only thing liberals favor manufacturing here is fake outrage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson