Posted on 06/28/2012 9:33:57 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/28/curl-roberts-to-the-rescue-for-romney/
Joseph Curl from the Washington Times
“In voting to uphold Mr. Obama’s disastrous health-care overhaul, the chief justice took away the president’s main line of attack that surely would have been deployed had the court voted 5-4, along party lines. The Divider in Chief, already bent on stoking cultural warfare — upper-middle class vs. lower-middle class, white against black against Hispanic, gay against straight, believers against non-believers — had no doubt hoped to win one more target for his bilious bifurcation.”
“Were the five justices appointed by Republican president to have stuck together in opposition, Mr. Obama would have toured the country (at taxpayer expense) to decry the court’s action as nothing more than an act political usurpation — how dare those five men take away the will of the people?!”
“But Justice Roberts did just the opposite (and, bonus, also strictly adhere to the original intent of the Constitution). Obamacare is unconstitutional if it were to be enacted via the Commerce Clause, but not if it’s simply a tax, the justice wrote. “Because the Constitution permits such a tax, it is not our role to forbid it, or to pass upon its wisdom or fairness.””
“In so doing, Justice Roberts has just busted Campaign 2012 wide open. The high court’s ruling leaves in place 21 tax increases costing nearly $700 billion. Of those taxes, 12 would affect families earning less than $250,000 per year.”
“Now that Obamacare’s penalty is a “tax,” not a “fee,” Mr. Obama is breaking a 2008 campaign pledge not to raise taxes on Americans earning less than $250,000. This new “tax” will hit across the economic spectrum, despite his campaign declaration that health care should “never be purchased with tax increase on middle-class families.” Now, Mr. Obama and congressional Democrats have enacted the largest tax increase in history.”
I threw away all my copies of the Constitution today.
Rush comes from a family of lawyers so I’m sure he knows the law. Levin wrote ‘Men In Black’ for goodness sakes, as a constitutional scholar he knows the law.
I can’t wait to listen to Levin later.
I am listening now. Go and read the post I responded to and you will understand my response in context.
LLS
HIS WIFE?? Is she a member of SCOTUS???
She is a member (or head of??? Can’t remember, just read it today) of an org called “Feminists For Life”.
Feminists??????????? Sounds disgusting. Nice they’re pro-life but FEMINISTS???
Sorry for the ???s I’m pretty worked up today as are most of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.