Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

“those that were for additional gun rights”

No, Sparky: not additional gun rights. What part of “shall not be infringed” is unclear to you?

We are so screwed.


10 posted on 07/27/2012 6:31:36 AM PDT by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jagusafr
What part of “shall not be infringed” is unclear to you? We are so screwed.

I agree, Jag. The Repub candidate has no core principles.

23 posted on 07/27/2012 6:47:27 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: jagusafr
>>We are so screwed.<<

Why do you say that? Honestly, would you surrender your firearms to someone who came to your door in an official capacity with the belief they had the authority to demand them from you or would you resist?

If you would in fact surrender them, then you do deserve to live on your knees in submission.

Just who do you think would re-arm America if we do surrender our weapons to the government officials?

Any official who orders that the civilians of these United States must surrender their firearms is in fact an enemy of the US Constitution and deserves whatever hostilities can be brought forth against him or her.

110 posted on 07/27/2012 12:14:22 PM PDT by B4Ranch (There's Two Choices... Stand Up and Be Counted ... Or Line Up and Be Numbered .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson