Posted on 10/08/2012 5:34:49 PM PDT by RummyChick
Today I’m going on the radio in Los Angeles to accuse the Obama administration of deliberately attempting to stage a hostage-taking in Benghazi as part of a manufactured “October Surprise” that Obama intended to make himself look great on the foreign stage in the lead up to the election. The plan — if you were paying attention — was set in motion at the Democrats’ convention in Charlotte in early September when repeated mentions of Obama as a “foreign policy president” were made. This was timed to lead up to September 11th…when deliberately lowered security at the Benghazi consulate (and OTHER consulates and embassies in the Mideast) was supposed to encourage Muslims to take Americans hostage like they did in 1979. Only, Obama’s plan was to negotiate their quick released by trading the “Blind Sheik” from the 1993 World Trade Center bombings for any Americans taken hostage on 9/11/2001. The plan was to make Obama look like “a badass” and a to have him revel in this through October and into the November election. In fact, the hostages were probably planned for release not long before the Foreign Policy Debate (the last of the three presidential debates this year) in Boca Raton, Florida. This was supposed to show Obama standing up to Muslims, negotiating “peace”, and proving to the world what an effective and strong leader he was.
Only…it blew up in his face and the administration has been in overdrive trying to cover this stuff up ever since. The only way any of this makes any sense, including the deliberate lowering of security and the disregard of Ambassador Chris Steven’s multiple pleas for help on the ground in Libya in the weeks prior to his murder, is that Barack Obama WANTED a hostage situation to happen so he could “look presidential by resolving it in October”… but the Muslims in Libya went overboard and killed people instead of just taking them hostage. This also explains why no effort was made to even look for the Ambassador and others missing from the consulate for many hours: Obama’s gang just assumed he was taken hostage as planned and were STUNNED to learn the ambassador was murdered.
Why else would Obama go to sleep so casually at 3am that night if he didn’t think things were just going according to plan…but when he woke up at 11am the next day he found that all Hell broke loose instead. And then the coverup began.
Folks, more people are going to eventually go to jail for what happened at Benghazi than went to prison for Watergate. This is a coverup that goes directly to Barack Obama himself. I have friends who lived through Watergate and who repeatedly tell me they had no idea in the initial days after a “break-in was reported in Democrat offices” that it would eventually topple Nixon and bring down so many powerful people. I love the woman on a personal level, but if Hillary Clinton knew about any of this and didn’t stop this scheme for a “hostage-taking October Surprise” then she belongs in prison too…along with Barack Obama, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, and a host of other women and effeminate men who thought lowering security at consulates so “something would happen that we could use in October” was a good idea.
Read more http://hillbuzz.org/did-obama-deliberately-try-to-stage-a-hostage-taking-in-benghazi-as-an-october-surprise-pr-stunt-that-blew-up-in-his-face-listen-live-at-330pm-cst-to-find-out-52149
Fast & Furious for the Second Amendment.
Benghazi for the election win.
As interesting as this sounds, I don’t think Zer0 or any of his fellow window lickers have enough intelligence to plan something as stupid as this.
Wow. Just wow!
I agree.
To the headline: would not surprise me.
Wildly implausible scenario. Trading the blind Sheik would have turned into a 48-state landslide against Zero.
this story is right on!
With Obama, ANYTHING is possible..but now that he screwed up, he can go on and on about how Bin Laden was killed on his watch..all Romney has to do is bring up how Obama has the blood of 4 Americans on his hands, killed on HIS watch
It does look suspicious.
I think the writer has compiled a ton of evidence and arrived at the only possible explanation for the Libya disaster.
Instead of going on the radio to discuss, he should go straight to a prosecutor and present the evidence.
A hostage taking would be done stealthily by a streamlined special ops team, not by 150-200 fanatics armed with mortars and RPGs.
Seems plausible...Not 100% sold, yet thank you for laying out what I need to look for in the upcoming BS storm. With everything we know about the purple lipped prince so far, this is not full blown tin foil data. More pieces could put credence to this, IMHO.
They could have planned something, but as we know, it went down really bad. Sounds consistant with the incompetence of this regime.
Correction: Benghazi for the First Amendment! Remember that 0bama was CONSTANTLY BLAMING THE MOVIE.
remember that releasing the Blind Terrorist was on the table..and then the WH denied it.
Oh' Wait...the plan failed...
Seriously, this "conspiracy" is pretty far out there...I need to dig my tin foil hat out closet...to adsorb the possibilities
“Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.”
And Barky’s got wheelbarrows full of stupid.
Part of me perversely wants to see zero getting re-elected if and only if it included the subsequent impeachment, trial and conviction on capital offenses.
People in Libya and in the CIA are sitting on an October surprise. May God grant them the fortitude, courage, and safety to do the right thing.
Uh, no.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.