So, if I understand this correctly, the attack began 40 minutes after Stevens met with the Turkish diplomat who was also serving as his weapons broker that supplied the Libyan rebels but who is now facilitating the transport of weapons to Syria from Libya?
I am more than a little confused about who is on which side of the issue.
What it looks like to me is that once the weapons deal was done, Stevens was no longer useful, and in fact was a liability who needed to be removed.
Stevens was certainly a useful idiot and an islamophile, just like his bosses, Hillary and Bambi. They probably expected Al Qaeda to love them and reward them for their generous support by at least pretending not to be the savages that they are.
The attack on the consulate was clearly planned in advance and they wanted specifically to get Stevens. Was it because he knew too much or maybe was having a sudden attack of conscience (or had even been told by Hillary or Obama to see if he could get the weapons back?).
It had onviously been planned well before his meeting with the Turk, but maybe the Turk gave the go-ahead signal. Or maybe not. Someone else pointed out that there must have been a mole in the operation somewhere.
Also,I think they wanted to get documents and information that was being kept at the consulate.