Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smogger; BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj

1916, Woodrow Wilson won reelection by a much smaller margin in the popular and electoral vote but since their were not 3 major candidates like 1912 he got a higher overall % of the popular vote.

Wilson really should have lost and I believe he did in fact not actually win California and thus the election.


19 posted on 10/26/2012 10:13:34 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

Wilson shouldn’t have run in the first place. If TR hadn’t been such a megalomaniac, he’d have sat down and shut up and allowed Taft to serve out two terms.


20 posted on 10/26/2012 10:17:36 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Impy

Wilson shouldn’t have won in the first place. If TR hadn’t been such a megalomaniac, he’d have sat down and shut up and allowed Taft to serve out two terms.


21 posted on 10/26/2012 10:17:41 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson