Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sequester: Sound and Fury; Signifying Nothing
Townhall.com ^ | February 25, 2013 | Dan Holler

Posted on 02/25/2013 6:38:31 AM PST by Kaslin

With the March 1st deadline for the sequester looming, the chorus of politicians and pundits decrying its passage in apocalyptic terms has reached a fevered pitch. These are the same political leaders who in the summer of 2011 agreed to implement these cuts if a broader spending deal could not be reached. The negotiations carried out by the Super Committee collapsed and the sequester agreement was passed and signed into law.

For months, the Administration promised the sequester would be turned off with a deal to offset the automatic across-the-board spending cuts. The President even went so far as to assure the American people in a debate with Governor Romney that the sequester simply “will not happen.” Of course, just one year prior to that he pledged to veto any bill that turned off the sequester. There is no seriousness here, only politics.

Now, with real spending cuts about to take effect, cynical politicians who supported this, have now pivoted their messaging to convince Americans that the sequester will result in catastrophic cuts to the military and other industries.

Just to be clear: the cuts are imperfect and blunt, but entirely necessary.

Of course, Obama does not believe any reduction in spending is necessary. If he acknowledged as much, it’d be a recognition that Americans need not be wholly dependent upon government. In his eyes, the sequester is an opportunity to make American feel as though they must have more government.

So, in recent days, the Administration has unleashed cabinet officials and political operatives to sound the alarms. Arne Duncan is warning of layoff notices for teachers. Tom Vilsack is warning of dire cuts to rural safety nets. Janet Napolitano is warning of a diminished ability to defend the homeland. All of a sudden, it’s a crisis.

As Shakespeare wrote in Macbeth, the proverbial wailing and gnashing of teeth is akin to “sound and fury; signifying nothing.” Without these cuts, debt held by the public will reach nearly 90% of our overall economy. We know from the experiences of other countries that this level of debt only increases the likelihood of a Greece-style debt crisis, guaranteeing a lower standard of living for all Americans and further diminishing opportunities for jobs and growth.

Many Republicans, even those prone to last minute dances of capitulation, have stood strong in the face of Obama’s embarrassing campaign-style assault. Remember, in January, Speaker John Boehner assured the Wall Street Journal he had the sequester “in his back pocket.”

He cannot allow Obama and other alarmists to play the role of pickpocket.

These cuts are only the first step in solving our fiscal crisis as they only reduce spending by $85 billion for this fiscal year in a budget totaling some $3.6 trillion. For those keeping score, that only amounts to about 2.4% of the overall budget. The government is still projected to have huge deficits this year totaling some $845 billion. This would seem to belie the accusations out of the White House that these cuts are “draconian.”

If draconian is forcing middle-class Americans to give up their daily $4 latte, so be it. That is much better than going bankrupt or leaving their children to shoulder their irresponsible burden.

Congress cannot simply kick the can down the road, again. The time for delay is over. If lawmakers are truly horrified by the shape – not size – of sequester, then by all means propose something. Tax hikes and gimmicks need not apply.

Once these spending reductions take effect and the American people see that the sky hasn’t fallen, perhaps Washington politicians will finally get serious about taking the necessary steps to put our fiscal house in order.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: barackobama; sequestration; spendingcuts

1 posted on 02/25/2013 6:38:42 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t buy into the whole premise. They’ve had over a year to work on this.


2 posted on 02/25/2013 6:49:08 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Fiscal cliff”, “Sequestor”. How about calling it what it is. The US is bankrupt due to three generations of consuming more than is produced and subsidizing the non productive. Reckoning cannot be forever postponed.


3 posted on 02/25/2013 6:49:52 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Sequester"

The idea originated with the White House. It was sold to Doktor Reid and passed by Congress. Now the chickens have come home to roost.

Hmmm...Obama started a game of "Chicken"...and lost.

4 posted on 02/25/2013 6:53:04 AM PST by asinclair (B*llshit is a renewable resource.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

It sure did originate in the White House


5 posted on 02/25/2013 7:02:39 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The "sequester" is supposed to cut 85 billion dollars, from this and that and everywhere. I propose eliminating the Department of Education, the budget of which last year was 68 billion dollars. That would take care of almost the whole "problem".
Not even liberals would claim that education in this country is better now than it was thirty years ago, when Carter set up the department, as a sop to the teachers' unions.
6 posted on 02/25/2013 7:07:59 AM PST by sima_yi ( Reporting live from the far North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Congress cannot simply kick the can down the road, again.

Want to bet?

Congress and the President will once again treat the symptoms and let the cancer grow. We are far from the end of the "can kicking". They will continue to kick the can until the economy completely tanks.

There will be no profiles in courage here.

7 posted on 02/25/2013 7:41:02 AM PST by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

From the same Macbeth scene:

When will Congress deal with spending?

“Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow . . . “

“. . . and all our yesterdays have lighted fools the way to dusty [debt]. . .”

Obama is “a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage.”

And the dire warning of the sequester cuts to those massive increases already made, and to those massive spending increases to come, is truly “a tale told by an idiot.”


8 posted on 02/25/2013 7:55:11 AM PST by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

What nobama finally lost was public credibility with his most recent over-stating the multitude of dire consequences.

When many of us were growing up we heard the tales from old, like “crying wolf”, which tells the eventual fail by over-stating a dire warning. Nobama must have never heard that story as his “raisers” were too busy telling him about Stalin’s successes.

Today’s people may have indeed changed, but human nature has not and eventually most firgure out the Crying Wolf deal. If we have any luck left, maybe this is the turning point.


9 posted on 02/25/2013 8:18:20 AM PST by X-spurt (Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson