Discounting Parents' Rights

For people of faith in America, the Obama administration's birth control mandate represents an unprecedented assault on religious conscience. It seems that the President and his surrogates have little appreciation for the role that faith plays in the lives of many Americans, and even less respect for the Constitution's protection of religious liberty. As if to confirm this impression, the U.S. Justice Department is doubling down on the Administration's anti-faith stance with a lawsuit against a German family seeking religious asylum in the United States. According to our esteemed Attorney General, the right to choose the best education for your child is not a fundamental individual liberty. When it comes to the education of our children, the government – not the parents – is the final authority.

Joe Carter writes about the plight of the Romeike family for the Action Institute's "Power Blog":

"The Romeikes had withdrawn their children from German public schools in 2006, after becoming concerned that the educational material employed by the school was undermining the tenets of their Christian faith. After accruing the equivalent of $10,000 worth of fines and the forcible removal of their children from the home, they chose to flee their homeland and seek asylum in the United States. They believed our government was more respectful of religious liberties.

On January 26, 2010, a federal immigration judge granted the Romeikes political asylum, ruling they had a reasonable fear of persecution for their beliefs if they returned to their homeland. The judge also denounced the German policy, saying it was, "utterly repellent to everything we believe as Americans." However, President Obama's Justice Department disagreed. They argued that the family should be denied asylum based on their contention that government may legitimately use its authority to force parents to send their kids to government-sanctioned schools."

Why should we be surprised? Of course the President doesn't trust the parents of America to make decisions regarding their children's education. According to his cradle-to-grave, nanny state philosophy, how could we the sheeple be expected to know anything about our children's educational needs? And how dare we expect that our personal values and beliefs play any role in the equation?

This is only the latest troubling policy emanating from Eric Holder's Justice Department. By discounting the right of parents to make the final decision regarding their children's education, the Attorney General is calling into question the ultimate nature of the parent-child relationship and the role of the family as the foundational unit of civil society. In his eyes it is the State, not the parent, that should decide what constitutes a "good" education, and the Obama Administration's motive for education is radically different from that of most parents.

Under our president's scheme, educating children means producing multicultural, socially-aware, environmentally-conscious, Progressive-minded citizens who believe that orthodox religion is evil, wealth is corrupting, and Uncle Sam knows better than they do what's good for them. The fact that approximately half the nation holds a different view of what America should stand for and how her government should operate matters not a whit. Mr. Obama won; he's got a mandate and he's made clear that he intends to use it.

Parents are generally guided by different motives than government when it comes to the education of their children. For parents, the considerations are not political, they are personal. A parent is invested in the well-being of their child from day one. Parents bear a natural responsibility for ensuring that their child grows into a responsible, virtuous citizen. They have a desire to see that their offspring act as a stewards of their familial inheritance, including religious traditions. Unless some kind of abuse is occurring (in which case few would dispute the government's legitimate role in intervening on behalf of a minor child), the government has no business overruling the wishes of parents when it comes to the child's education. To suggest otherwise is a breathtaking invasion of privacy and a brazen usurpation of the fundamental natural rights of parenthood (rights that precede the Constitution and are most certainly protected by it).

The media may not recognize it, but this is a huge story with extremely troubling implications. If Eric Holder is successful in establishing a legal precedent that parents have no natural right to educate their own children, then it is no exaggeration to say that America is only one generation away from our constitution being reduced to a hollow shell. The American people better wake up, and wake up fast. Our leaders are quietly executing a systematic assault on our liberty right under our noses, and we are asleep at the wheel – preoccupied with our Facebook pages and Twitter feeds and reality television. In order for democracy to survive, we must be an informed and engaged public. But I fear that increasingly, we are neither.

I don[t know for sure if this is the Judge Lawrence O. Burman or not. Can someone confirm it?

In his ruling, Judge Lawrence O. Burman acknowledged that not every country can be expected to follow the United States’ Constitution. But in the case of the Romeikes, formerly of Bissingen, Germany, Burman said the rights that were being violated were “basic human rights that no country has a right to violate.” “Homeschoolers are a particular social group that the German government is trying to suppress,” the judge stated in his decision, according to the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), which represented the family in their case. Though Germany is a democratic country and a U.S. ally, Burman noted Tuesday that its policy against homeschoolers is “repellent to everything we believe as Americans.” In Germany, it is illegal to homeschool children between the ages of six to 18 as school attendance is mandatory for those in that age group. ... "This family has a well-founded fear of persecution,” Burman ruled. “[T]herefore, they are eligible for asylum … and the court will grant asylum.”

But now the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF does NOT agree.

“The Obama administration is basically saying there is no right to home school anywhere,” Michael Farris, founder of the Home School Legal Defense Association (which is representing the Romeike family) told Fox News. “It’s an utter repudiation of parental liberty and religious liberty.” “They are trying to send a family back to Germany where they would certainly lose custody of their children,” Farris said. “Our government is siding with Germany.” “That means they don’t want to have significant numbers of people who think differently than what the government thinks,” he said. “It’s an incredibly dangerous assertion that people can’t think in a way that the government doesn’t approve of.” Farris quipped that the Obama administration could grant millions of current illegal immigrants what amounts to amnesty, yet his administration is seeking deport one German family. “Eleven million people are going to be allowed to stay freely – but this one family is going to be shipped back to Germany to be persecuted,” he said. “It just doesn’t make any sense.” If returned to Germany, the Romeikes face thousands of dollars in fines, prison sentences and the potential of losing their children, according to reports in the Associated Press and Fox News. “Families that want to have an alternative education can’t get it in Germany,” Farris said. “Even the private schools have to teach public school curriculum.”

Rand Paul was on Beck this morning and after he explained how his version of amnesty was not amnesty, Beck broached this subject, Paul had no knowledge of it.

He did promise to look into it and file a friend of the court brief or some such claptrap.

One would think since we have 20 million illegals here we could find room for a small family who are legally petitioning the government, but hey they are white, can't have preferential treatment here I guess.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.