Posted on 03/31/2013 12:19:45 PM PDT by Libloather
Re: “They are hardly the size to be placed on a drone.”
I disagree.
25 years ago, a weapon weighing 100 pounds, that’s total weight, could deliver a 1 kiloton blast.
I agree that building these things can be very difficult.
But the basic plans are widely understood.
It would appear that the South got all of the hot chicks.
Send in a Seal team, nab the boy king, waterboard him for a few minutes, and he’ll issue the surrender orders to his military.
North Korean workers nap on piles of fertilizer shipped from China on the banks of Yalu River near the North Korean town of Sinuiju
In the 1980’s we had tactical nukes in the 1 kiloton range that weighed 100 to 200 pounds.
A 10 kiloton nuke on an ICBM weighed around 1000 pounds.
I notice all the dudes standing around Fat Boy have little note pads and pens. Whats up with that? Copying down some pearl of wisdom by the what-ever-he’s called?
True enough, but the Korean nukes are more like Fat Man size.
Yes, I’ve lived at Hanford all my life — Norks have a long ways to go.
Like Jack Benny did when he was retiring: “Welcome to my third final farewell special TV Show”
Re: “The Korean nukes are more like Fat Man size.”
I hope you’re right.
Did they reach their destination?
Thank you for remembering the DSL, dear Mr Apple!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.