Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN peacekeepers cross the line of warfare in the Congo
ABC (Australia) ^ | 23 April 2013 | Jeni Whalan

Posted on 04/23/2013 6:01:15 PM PDT by Pan_Yan

The idea that peacekeepers should not initiate military action has prevailed ... until now. Jeni Whalan says the new "intervention brigade" in the Congo has stretched the institution of peacekeeping to breaking point.

There's a fine, but critical, line between keeping the peace and waging a war.

For the blue-helmeted United Nations peacekeepers deployed in some of the world's worst conflict zones, it's a line that is constantly, violently tested - by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia in the early 1990s; by rebels who this month killed five peacekeepers in South Sudan. Yet the greatest challenge may have come from the United Nations itself.

Last month, the United Nations Security Council established an "intervention brigade" to take offensive military action against rebel groups in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

It's a decision that takes UN peacekeeping into uncharted waters. Peacekeeping is the UN's policy instrument of choice for responding to violent conflict around the world. It entails diverse tasks, from monitoring buffer zones to holding elections to demobilising militia forces. But never has UN peacekeeping involved combat operations to defeat an armed group through military force.

The Congo's new peacekeepers are charged with precisely that: with "neutralising" militia in the country's east. The move follows an earlier decision in which the Security Council dropped its historic reluctance to give peacekeepers intelligence-gathering capacity, authorising their use of surveillance drones to monitor conflict activity. Despite assurances that the DRC is an exceptional case, these are precedents that demand careful scrutiny.

(Excerpt) Read more at abc.net.au ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: africa; cambodia; congo; globalgovernment; khmerrouge; newworldorder; oneworldgovernment; peacekeepers; un; waronterror
Why does the idea of the United Nations using drones not sit well with me?
1 posted on 04/23/2013 6:01:15 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Maybe the locals just don’t like the competition in rapes.


2 posted on 04/23/2013 6:14:45 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

Ya beat me by a hair’s breadth!


3 posted on 04/23/2013 6:24:50 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

There is some kind of problem in the Congo???? WHO KNEW??????


4 posted on 04/23/2013 6:27:17 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred
Just for fun here's a quick look at what you're tax money is financing in the Congo:

MONUSCO Facts and Figures

Current authorization until 31 March 2014
Security Council resolution 2098 (2013) PDF Document of 28 March 2013

Strength

Initial authorization

Additional authorization

On 28 March 2013, the Security Council decided by resolution 2098 that MONUSCO shall, for an initial period of one year and within the authorized troop ceiling of 19,815, include an “Intervention Brigade” consisting inter alia of three infantry battalions, one artillery and one Special force and Reconnaissance company.

Current strength (28 February 2013)

*Note: Statistics for international and local civilians are as of 31 December 2012

Country contributors

Military personnel

Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burkina Faso, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Egypt, France, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Jordan, Kenya, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Morocco, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Senegal, Serbia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Tanzania, Tunisia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Yemen and Zambia.

Police personnel

Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Côte d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Egypt, France, Guinea, India, Jordan, Madagascar, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Romania, Russian Federation, Senegal, Sweden, Switzerland, Togo, Turkey, Ukraine and Yemen.

Fatalities

Financial aspects


5 posted on 04/23/2013 6:38:25 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (I believe in God. All else is dubious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

The premise that the UN has never been used as a military force is a lie - see Korean War for further details


6 posted on 04/23/2013 6:42:29 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
16 Years of U.S. Genocide in Congo

The Shameless Vacuity of Susan Rice's Black Boosters

7 posted on 04/23/2013 6:49:15 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

BINGO!


8 posted on 04/23/2013 6:51:22 PM PDT by Lysandru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reed13k
The premise that the UN has never been used as a military force is a lie - see Korean War for further details

She's talking about the UN Peacekeepers, which is its own department started in 1958. Having done a lot of reading on them lately it looks like their primary function is to provide jobs for third world soldiers from places like Bangladesh (8,826), Pakistan (8,251) and Ethiopia (6,514). Oh, and they must have a whole section that does nothing but make up acronyms.

This is kind of an interesting page.

9 posted on 04/23/2013 6:54:19 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (I believe in God. All else is dubious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

Yep. It’s too bad our highly paid Congress with their padded intelligence briefs aren’t willing to see what they enable.


10 posted on 04/23/2013 7:02:57 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (I believe in God. All else is dubious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Why should they care?

They make me sick.


11 posted on 04/23/2013 7:09:54 PM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

I cede the department, but the article still comes across as though the UN as a whole is venturing into new territory. Interesting stuff though.


12 posted on 04/23/2013 7:16:31 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
peace, as they say, is more than simply the absence of war...
13 posted on 04/23/2013 7:39:24 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Pan_Yan.
Last month, the United Nations Security Council established an "intervention brigade" to take offensive military action against rebel groups in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. It's a decision that takes UN peacekeeping into uncharted waters.
Uncharted? Hardly. Apparently the nimrod who swilled out this shill piece never heard of Korea or Vietnam.


14 posted on 04/23/2013 7:42:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

First link is a Marxist website on steroids. Just sayin’.


15 posted on 04/23/2013 8:33:42 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn
First link is a Marxist website on steroids.

Here is another one.

link

16 posted on 04/24/2013 11:37:20 AM PDT by bigheadfred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It is uncharted waters. This is the first UN offensive without the US there to do all the actual offensiving.


17 posted on 04/24/2013 2:56:29 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

Lol!


18 posted on 04/24/2013 3:23:47 PM PDT by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson