Obama Appointed FCC Chairman Considers Dropping Ban On Explicit Profanity and “Non-Sexual” Nudity

1 posted on 05/02/2013 8:27:11 PM PDT by KentuckyTim

first amendment but not for anyone who opposes the faker in the blight house...

3 posted on 05/02/2013 8:31:13 PM PDT by cherry

Non-sexual nudity?

Moosechelle? Pelosi? Barney Fwank? Helen Thomas?

Help me out here people!

4 posted on 05/02/2013 8:31:25 PM PDT by null and void ("Och, aye 'twas a huge beastie the shape of a haggis but the size o' the football pitch at Dunkeld!")

The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals

#24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

http://rense.com/general32/americ.htm

(Hurry up, commies!)

5 posted on 05/02/2013 8:31:38 PM PDT by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)

...where is this love for free speech when it comes to proselytizing in the military...”

Also, relating to the benefits of natural, herbal alternatives to good health, which the FDA says cannot be stated...

6 posted on 05/02/2013 8:34:22 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

They only want you to take approved Big Pharma pills at $10/pop....

And of course muslims can do all the proselytizing they want!/s

7 posted on 05/02/2013 8:44:10 PM PDT by Frank_2001

To: null and void

I was wondering how nudity could be non sexual and then you gave three examples in the same post. Just DAMN! they would make my eyes bleed and me impotent, non sexual indeed!

8 posted on 05/02/2013 8:56:36 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)

Soooooo, one of the 4 aroused you?....

9 posted on 05/02/2013 9:00:32 PM PDT by null and void ("Och, aye 'twas a huge beastie the shape of a haggis but the size o' the football pitch at Dunkeld!")

To: null and void

10 posted on 05/02/2013 9:01:03 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( Concerning bo -- that refers to the president. If I capitalize it, I mean the dog.)

To: KentuckyTim; All

To begin with, the Founding States made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, evidently a good place to hide them from Obama, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in unelected bureaucrats in constitutionally undefined federal agencies like the FCC. So no bureaucrat in so-called "independent federal regulatory agencies" like the FCC can regulate speech, even to declare that there are no regulations.

And speaking of regulating speech, Thomas Jefferson had noted that the Founding States had made the 10th Amendment to clarify that the states had reserved government power to regulate our constitutional rights, even those protected by the 1st Amendment, uniquely to the states, power now limited by the 14th Amendment, regardless that the Founding States had also made the 1st Amendment to clarify that such powers are prohibited to Congress entirely.

"3. Resolved that it is true as a general principle and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the constitution that ‘the powers not delegated to the US. by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively or to the people’: and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the US. by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, & were reserved, to the states or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated rather than the use be destroyed (emphasis added); …" --Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.

So as Jefferson indicated, it's basically up to the individual states, not Congress or any rogue agency of the corrupt federal government, to reasonably decide how far laws to limit speech can go.

11 posted on 05/02/2013 9:01:42 PM PDT by Amendment10

Because there’s not enough filth on TV.

12 posted on 05/02/2013 9:01:42 PM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby.)

HEY-HEY,
HO-HO,
Commie Obama
Has got to GO!

13 posted on 05/02/2013 9:08:15 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)

on the road to perdition

14 posted on 05/02/2013 9:09:15 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)

my sister worked for a “first amendment lawyer”and when I asked what that was she said he mostly defended porn stores.

15 posted on 05/02/2013 9:14:59 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)

16 posted on 05/02/2013 9:21:19 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)

Corruption, perversion, Obama, ‘Rats, the future.

17 posted on 05/02/2013 9:25:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)

To: null and void

It must mean nudity that does not take place during sexual intercourse.

18 posted on 05/02/2013 9:31:11 PM PDT by Slyfox (The Key to Marxism is Medicine ~ Vladimir Lenin)

Wait a sec, I thought that little freak was no longer in that position.

IF this is accurate, it doesn’t even make me blink -
the faster the wheels fall off this whole mess, the more
time to do the real work of cleaning out the filth.

19 posted on 05/02/2013 9:40:46 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44

To: null and void

Oh my god it did make me temporarily blind! After three I could see no more! Evil Evil Evil!

20 posted on 05/02/2013 9:51:02 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794