Posted on 05/22/2013 5:07:30 AM PDT by jimbo123
It is neater than arresting them. We don’t need anything being said that conflicts with the official story line.
That's what we lawyers call a “conclusory allegation.” It gives no real details, jumps over everything that actually happened, and just gives a conclusion that serves the shooter's interests. It would be nice to see genuine details of the alleged attack. The decedent was apparently into MMA and he might actually have tried to do lethal damage to the FBI agent, just as Trayvon Martin tried to do to George Zimmerman, and received the same appropriate response. OTOH the present story leaves the issue hanging and the agent might have deliberately murdered the decedent. With the present evil regime, it's impossible to say which is true. Indeed, with the regime controlling the evidence and no real details being given, a strong suspicion of foul play by the agent hangs over this incident.
What type of hoodie was he wearing?
Hey it’s Florida unarmed guys are shot and killed all the time ,seems crazy that a suspect would be interviewed by an agent with a weapon? Are they saying the FBI cannot subdue an unarmed suspect without deadly force?
Is AWAH we killed him all there is? Unreal!
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/ibragim-todashev-fbi-shooting-boston-tsarnaev-134458251.html
“He felt inside he was going to get shot. I told him, ‘Everything is going to be fine, don’t worry about it.’ He said, ‘I have a really bad feeling.’”
It’s a toss up if this is true or not. Either way, the story doesn’t work. The FBI interview him for 3 hours at the apartment and then take him off somewhere. Where did they take him? If to the FBI office and he’s in there for questioning, then no one bothered to search him for weapons??? What caused him to confess to the murders in Boston or is that another tall tale? Why did he suddenly feel the need to buy tickets out of the country? I’m buying more tin foil stock because this is getting way too hinky.
Ok, other articles state the shooting was at the apartment complex so the FBI didn’t take him anywhere.
I’ve read only the first 20 replies so maybe others have commented on this, but how, and why in blazes could this guy have a knife in his possession while being interrogated? Wasn’t he searched for a weapon(s) before being detained and taken to wherever the questioning was done? Something really is out of whack here. FBI agents this lax? Hard to believe this.
Since exactly when could one 'normally trust the FBI'? They have been plagued, since inception, with questionable motives and operations. Its just that most folks haven't done a bit of research that they have this manufactured aura of 'good guy-ness' (and the operative word there is manufactured...)
the infowarrior
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.