To: 2ndDivisionVet
But when Luczyk started her speech by telling the crowd that former President Ronald Reagan supported background checks, she was drowned out by shouts of "Germany 1933" and "Hitler."
I hope none of those 2nd amendment chest pounding dimwits are never confronted by dimmer wits that SHOULD have had a background check.
6 posted on
09/01/2013 1:32:46 AM PDT by
lewislynn
(What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
To: lewislynn
Because not being vocal in the face (literally and figutatively) of rights-grabbing politicians has worked out so well for California? What, exactly, are you criticizing here?
You realize what these pols are calling for is de facto registration, right?
11 posted on
09/01/2013 2:53:44 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: lewislynn
Criminals will be able to find guns even if the law abiding are stupid enough to submit to the government being able to determine who actually gets to have the rights guaranteed by the 2nd amendment. Background checks were never about making people safer. We know they don't work. It has always been about expanding the power and scope of government.
21 posted on
09/01/2013 5:23:31 AM PDT by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: lewislynn
shall not be infringed means just that.
26 posted on
09/01/2013 5:50:48 AM PDT by
teeman8r
(Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
To: lewislynn
But when Luczyk started her speech by telling the crowd that former President Ronald Reagan supported background checks, she was drowned out by shouts of "Germany 1933" and "Hitler." I hope none of those 2nd amendment chest pounding dimwits are never confronted by dimmer wits that SHOULD have had a background check. You are the dimmest wit of all. I hope you never learn the hard way of what it would be like to be confronted by a known, illegally armed adversary that wished you harm as your application for a legal firearm languished in a forgotten file.
28 posted on
09/01/2013 6:57:25 AM PDT by
jdsteel
(Give me freedom, not more government.)
To: lewislynn
If one must get government permission to buy a gun, a Right becomes a government granted privilege. Get it?
29 posted on
09/01/2013 7:22:34 AM PDT by
SpeakerToAnimals
(I hope to earn a name in battle)
To: lewislynn
Constitutionally ignorant gunphobes should be required to get government permission prior to posting their opinions.
30 posted on
09/01/2013 7:31:05 AM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
To: lewislynn
There should be zero gun laws. Commit a crime with a gun, and get a minimum of 50 years.
If people cannot be trusted to own a gun, then why are they walking the streets?
31 posted on
09/01/2013 7:45:58 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson