Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
But when Luczyk started her speech by telling the crowd that former President Ronald Reagan supported background checks, she was drowned out by shouts of "Germany 1933" and "Hitler."
I hope none of those 2nd amendment chest pounding dimwits are never confronted by dimmer wits that SHOULD have had a background check.
6 posted on 09/01/2013 1:32:46 AM PDT by lewislynn (What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lewislynn

Because not being vocal in the face (literally and figutatively) of rights-grabbing politicians has worked out so well for California? What, exactly, are you criticizing here?

You realize what these pols are calling for is de facto registration, right?


11 posted on 09/01/2013 2:53:44 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
Criminals will be able to find guns even if the law abiding are stupid enough to submit to the government being able to determine who actually gets to have the rights guaranteed by the 2nd amendment. Background checks were never about making people safer. We know they don't work. It has always been about expanding the power and scope of government.
21 posted on 09/01/2013 5:23:31 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

shall not be infringed means just that.


26 posted on 09/01/2013 5:50:48 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn
But when Luczyk started her speech by telling the crowd that former President Ronald Reagan supported background checks, she was drowned out by shouts of "Germany 1933" and "Hitler." I hope none of those 2nd amendment chest pounding dimwits are never confronted by dimmer wits that SHOULD have had a background check.

You are the dimmest wit of all. I hope you never learn the hard way of what it would be like to be confronted by a known, illegally armed adversary that wished you harm as your application for a legal firearm languished in a forgotten file.

28 posted on 09/01/2013 6:57:25 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

If one must get government permission to buy a gun, a Right becomes a government granted privilege. Get it?


29 posted on 09/01/2013 7:22:34 AM PDT by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

Constitutionally ignorant gunphobes should be required to get government permission prior to posting their opinions.


30 posted on 09/01/2013 7:31:05 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

There should be zero gun laws. Commit a crime with a gun, and get a minimum of 50 years.

If people cannot be trusted to own a gun, then why are they walking the streets?


31 posted on 09/01/2013 7:45:58 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson