negotiate with those god**mn-- no-account... 
scumsucking--
mother***king... 
baby killing--
fur wearing... 
seal clubbing--
climate change denying... 
souless--
terrorist... 
Republicans.
Posted on 10/08/2013 5:08:22 PM PDT by Libloather
negotiate with those god**mn-- no-account... scumsucking--
mother***king... baby killing--
fur wearing... seal clubbing--
climate change denying... souless--
terrorist... Republicans.
Indeed. In addition, your credit score is downgraded.
Zer0 is now giving the appearance of having the “I’m the ONLY sane person in the world” syndrome.
If you really think that . . . .
You don’t have to be smart to be a ruthless ideologue. In fact, a certain level of stupidity probably helps.
“.........President Obama has often chosen to unilaterally circumvent the law under the guise of executive authority. Most recently, that was demonstrated in July with his delay of Obamacare mandates for corporations, but it has been a hallmark of this presidency.
Courts have held that President Obama violated the Constitution with certain “recess” appointments, ignoring the required consent of Congress. He has abused executive-branch “rule making” rather than working with Congress to pass laws. He has ignored the letter of the law when it comes to religious liberty and work requirements for welfare.
President Obama has used executive orders to unilaterally change U.S. immigration laws. His administration has used waivers to change laws such as No Child Left Behind to compel states to adopt new policies.
In some of these instances, the president attempted to garner statutory authority, failed to do so and then acted in defiance of that. In other instances, he never bothered to find consensus and ignored Congress from the outset, usually contending that he simply had no choice. This is no way to govern, and it cripples the system of checks and balances that our Founding Fathers envisioned.....”
>>next he will holds his breath...
Advanced tactics from Pres. StompyFoot.
>>There is a difference between not making your mortgage payment for a month or two if you can’t make it and when you have been given the money for the mortgage payments but decide not to pay because your season tickets to the opera are due.
You nailed it.
Love it.
Conservatives can play the analogy game, too. The difference is that ours are more analogous.
He’s like every liberal I know. Some of them may be smart, but NONE have any common sense.
The only reason he isn’t already taking houses is because if he took them all, what would he do with them? There are only so many of his cronies he can give them to.
It’s the same problem the banks have. If they foreclose on thousands of houses, what are they going to do with them? For a house to have value, you must either live in it, rent it, or sell it. Otherwise it’s like having your money locked in a vault you can’t open.
StompyFoot wants to destroy America, but keep it running enough to enjoy the luxury here. This presents him with many dilemmas. He can’t crush all of us completely or he will have no slave labor to serve him.
He will pick and choose whose houses he seizes. The problem is, most of the ultra-rich are liberals. As much as he likes to promote class warfare, if you took away the 0vomit voters, the drastic income disparities that he complains about would disappear. (Not completely, of course, but the majority of the ultra-rich and ultra-poor.)
Isn’t it ironic that he complains about income disparity yet gets his votes from those in poverty and those in luxury (Buffet, Gates, Hollyweird, ...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.