Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/17/2013 9:19:07 AM PDT by listenhillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: listenhillary

2 posted on 10/17/2013 9:19:48 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary

This is an excellent article.

The fundamental question is - will Democrat voters continue to “hope” that that Obamacare is a positive, in the face of everyday evidence and experience that says it’s a huge fubar.


3 posted on 10/17/2013 9:22:11 AM PDT by nascarnation (Frequently wrong but rarely in doubt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

When it becomes apparent to those that sign up for new health plans with unaffordable deductibles, when the new Medicaid member can’t have the needed medical procedure because no doctors are accepting patients, I hope they look back on how hard the TEA party and a handful of Republicans have fought to stop this horrible decent into madness.

I hope they remember the media talking heads that lied and shielded politicians and the administration by ridiculing their accusers.


5 posted on 10/17/2013 9:29:28 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary

Anyone registered as a Republican can prepare to be SCREWED by 0bamacare. Health care will be used as a weapon against anyone who doesn’t bow to the King. Why should we think things will be different than they were for the Tea Party over at the IRS? And WTF has happened to the hearings and Lerner? Crickets..


6 posted on 10/17/2013 9:30:42 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary
Good article but because the author opted out of Medicare/insurance enrollment she misses point 11. October 2014 will usher in a new diagnosis coding called ICD 10. Even the CMS official responsible for initiating this monstrosity has admitted that PHYSICIANS NEED TO HAVE ACCESS TO ADEQUATE CAPITAL TO FUND THEIR PRACTICES FOR 6-8 MONTHS as this change will produce almost no revenue for that time period.

So be prepared to see your non salaried Doc go belly up oh around January 1,2015

8 posted on 10/17/2013 9:42:02 AM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary

From the article:

Ten Things to Expect from Obamacare in 2014

1. The expansion of Medicaid, with increased cost burden for taxpayers.

2. “Sticker shock” as the reality of higher health insurance premiums hits home.

3. Large and small employers are cutting health insurance benefits.

4. The employer-based health insurance policies that remain will have higher out-of-pocket costs for employees.

5. Fewer types of health insurance policies can be offered under Obamacare.

6. Many people cannot keep their doctors.

7. Further destruction of Medicare.

8. Loss of ownership of your medical records.

9. More waivers and exemptions for the political elites and Democrat cronies.

10. On January 1, 2014, the Individual Mandate to purchase Obamacare-compliant health insurance goes into effect.


9 posted on 10/17/2013 9:47:23 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary
Your doctors, hospitals, and other health professionals are being pressured to adopt electronic medical record systems and send patient information to the federal government's medical database by 2015. If they don't comply, they'll be penalized with reduced payments for services. This means the government will own your personal, private information, and you have no say in the matter. I consider this a complete loss of your privacy, as well as a violation of the Constitution's 5th Amendment "Takings" clause.

It's not only a violation of the 5th Amendment, but it also violates Roe v. Wade.

Roe v. Wade established the “right to privacy.” I personally believe that the right to privacy is inherent in the unenumerated rights referred to in the Ninth Amendment, although I don’t believe it is applicable to the abortion issue, but that’s a subject for another day.

So the question is: If the right to privacy designated in Roe v. Wade is widely accepted (especially by leftists) as the Law of the Land, wouldn’t that mean that the government has no right to our personal healthcare information?

Doesn’t that put Obamacare at odds with Roe v. Wade, and thus render it unconstitutional? Of course I realize that the Supreme Court ruled Obamacare to be constitutionally valid, but that is because the right to privacy was never brought up in the arguments to be considered, nor addressed in the Court’s decision.

12 posted on 10/17/2013 9:56:22 AM PDT by Maceman (Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary; All
"Ten Things to Expect from Obamacare in 2014"



Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


15 posted on 10/17/2013 10:02:15 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary

Excellent article written by an actual doctor.

Wouldn’t it be something if the doctors who treat our rulers went on a strike, refusing to treat them in solidarity with the doctors out here in the real world?

A white out.
sorry, that’s probably racis. Verbotten in Obamaland.


18 posted on 10/17/2013 11:11:43 AM PDT by Texas resident (The GOP sold us all out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary
At some point, when we go to sell our houses we will have to fork over 3% to the feds for Obamacare after paying the realtor 6%.

When is that supposed to kick in?

19 posted on 10/17/2013 11:49:05 AM PDT by Slyfox (Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary; Liz; sickoflibs
In an almost comical understatement, President Obama summarized these massive failures as "a few glitches." I think that Luke Chung, IT expert and president of database solutions firm FMS, explained the situation much more accurately: "What should clearly be an enterprise quality, highly scalable software application felt like it wouldn't pass a basic code review. It appears the people who built the site don't know what they're doing, never used it and didn't test it."

Ping

25 posted on 10/17/2013 2:01:00 PM PDT by GOPJ (Brieitbart sent me... Freeper newfreep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary

-——Obamacare seeks to replace the adaptability and efficiency of our free markets with heavy-handed government control and micromanaging by bureaucrats who don’t have a clue about what really helps patients.——

and..... is grounds for revolution.


26 posted on 10/17/2013 2:11:49 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Travon... Felony assault and battery hate crime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: listenhillary
"What should clearly be an enterprise quality, highly scalable software application felt like it wouldn't pass a basic code review. It appears the people who built the site don't know what they're doing, never used it and didn't test it." Chung went on to call it a "technological disaster."

$700M doesn't go as far as it used to.

27 posted on 10/17/2013 3:07:43 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson