To: GrootheWanderer
So why were the democrats trying to take down McAuliffe by funding Sarvis?
2 posted on
11/06/2013 12:26:24 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: cripplecreek
Exactly!!
This article is just pure bullsh-t. This close mindedness is why some libertarians will never gain respect - because they are more label sensitive than any Republican ever thought about being. Took more from Mac? Really? Is that why Sarvis got 9% of those who oppose Obamacare - which is virtually all of his voters? They were really Mac voters? Really?
No self respecting libertarian would claim Sarvis. The Pauls spit him out like vomit. He was financed by liberal Clintonista buddies of McAuliffe…..and yet, this clown still spouts his crap.
5 posted on
11/06/2013 12:31:02 PM PST by
C. Edmund Wright
(Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
To: cripplecreek
"So why were the democrats trying to take down McAuliffe by funding Sarvis?" Exactly
44 posted on
11/06/2013 1:14:38 PM PST by
CatherineofAragon
((Support Christian white males----the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
To: cripplecreek
Kind of negates the entire concept no?
65 posted on
11/06/2013 4:47:55 PM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson