Skip to comments.Who's lying? Benghazi witnesses vs. State Dept. Narratives clash amid new report of 'unarmed,
Posted on 11/28/2013 3:06:04 PM PST by Nachum
TEL AVIV None of the security officers inside the U.S. compound were armed during the Sept. 11, 2012, attack and one was barefoot while another two were riding around in a Land Cruiser, according to the witness testimony given to a U.S. House panel.
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga., chairman of the House Intelligence Subcommittee, disclosed the details in an interview with Fox News earlier this week.
Unreported by Fox News is that the witness testimony of unarmed personnel directly contradicts the narrative in the extensive report released by the State Department-sponsored Accountability Review Board, or ARB.
The ARB report states the personnel inside the compound were armed and even describes how the security officers retrieved their weapons.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
We all know that the State Department ie Hillary Clinton, LIED.
Run, Hillary, run...
It’s really sad when one knows in ones heart, and soul the government one trusted so much one never gave a thought about it can’t be trusted to tell even a little truth.
Dereliction of Duty File and First Degree Murder File for the 2014 Impeachment of B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, a legal citizen of the Sovereign Nation of Indonesia.
Why would they be unarmed?
Because they were ordered to be unarmed. That’s why.
Let Republicanprofessor know if you want on or off this list.
Unarmed? Sounds like they are building ‘inventory’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.