Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1
In this case, I approve; It’s not political. They were liars and cheaters, and democrats have no business handling nuclear weapons.

Or at least, that is the official story. And I no longer believe official stories.

8 posted on 03/28/2014 3:32:03 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

“And I no longer believe official stories.”

No one should. Ever. It’s that simple.


10 posted on 03/28/2014 4:02:34 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
Or at least, that is the official story. And I no longer believe official stories.

Good point, and I should have considered that possibility.

In a reasonable exam, there should be no cheating, no tolerance of cheating, and no tolerance of any integrity issues. If they were given a closed book exam on "What page of the manual addresses the obscure topic of . . . quote the entire passage verbatim" then it's a leadership issue and may have been intended to produce this result. Either they would fail the nuclear weapons safety exam and be drummed out for incompetence, or they would be drummed out for cheating.

I was too quick to trust FedGov just because it used to be a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. I hope I will learn - and that all Americans will learn. FedGov is not worthy of our automatic trust on any issue.

27 posted on 03/28/2014 6:59:26 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson