Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Voter Fraud Tainted ’12 Election
Rightwing News ^ | April 9, 2014 | Dick Morris

Posted on 04/10/2014 5:36:18 PM PDT by kingattax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: kingattax; patriot08

We all knew it that day.


21 posted on 04/10/2014 6:51:40 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Voter fraud in the democ’Rat ranks has been pervasive for decades. JFK won the election back in 1960 because voter fraud in the greater Chicago metro area put him over the top. A retired lawyer friend of mine (my age) returned home to Chicago from a north east Ivy league college on Xmas break after the November election. A HS friend of his bragged he had voted eighteen times for JFK. Multiply that number by hundreds, or thousands, who pulled this same stunt and you get the picture.
22 posted on 04/10/2014 6:53:05 PM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Bump


23 posted on 04/10/2014 6:57:31 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

37000+ people voted in multiple states? and you have the PROOF?!

WHY AREN’T WARRANTS BEING ISSUED?


24 posted on 04/10/2014 7:18:12 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

I betcha Dewey really did defeat Truman too!


25 posted on 04/10/2014 7:19:27 PM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim ("It is not the color of his skin, ... it is the blackness that fills his soul")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Yeah, I'm not sure "which side" committed it either but I have an inkling, just an inkling, that it just might be the party that is suing over voter ID laws, the side that screams "voter suppression" and "racism," over being forced to present photo IDs but hey, I'm just some idiot here in flyover country in a state that has enacted a strict photo ID a as well as proof of citizenship for those registering to vote!

Here in Kansas (flyover country to Dickie Morris), we've had proven fraud, at least on the Eastern side of the State Line (Missouri) by people who live on one side of that of the State Line and either own a business or merely work on the other side, believe they have the absolute right to vote in EACH state!

Guess to which party they are registered, actually, you don't need to guess, you already know!

26 posted on 04/10/2014 7:57:53 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Can’t someone find a mathwizzy statisticion to cull out percentages on the 35+K figure?

I think its if ones’ in a room of 40 there’s VERY high chance someone has matching birth day (not actual full date as in year month day match)

Heck McDonald’s is just airing a commercial where they’ve actually assembled what looks like 50 or so guys named Ronald McDonald for a vid shot - just saw it once and all look between 25-65 (can travel easily) so what’s chance of two of them having been born the very same day?

Libs are doubtless waving fingers about this kind of thing.

I’m thinking 3/4 to 4/5 is real voter fraud / double voting.

Reminds me of Melissa Harris-Perry making a comment on a Saturday show last year where she said she didn’t mind people being double registered because they can’t possibly get in a plane and vote in two states same day. You can’t believe her voice on this and then she breaks off and chortels like a sorority girl w/ her buds about some mundane thing to get to a break.

These people are ruthless pigs.


27 posted on 04/10/2014 8:15:43 PM PDT by BonRad (The world is full of educated derelicts-Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Dick — If one side wants to protect the integrity of the electoral process with voter ID and the other doesn’t, which side is committing the voter fraud?


28 posted on 04/10/2014 8:45:39 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

How do we know who perpetrated the fraud? Easy. If they were republican votes there would be an army of investigators from the DOJ and it would be playing non stop on PBSCBNBCNN. Holder would be on the case faster than he can cry “racist.” Obama would be giving speeches daily.


29 posted on 04/11/2014 1:11:49 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

“The GOP rino knew this and sat quietly in the corner, they are accomplices”

The fact that nothing was done after Al Gore won 104% of the vote (or something like that) in Philly in 2000 says it all.


30 posted on 04/11/2014 3:49:19 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sten
37000+ people voted in multiple states? and you have the PROOF?!
WHY AREN’T WARRANTS BEING ISSUED?
What is clearly needed is an interstate effort by local prosecutors to coordinate their investigations of double voters. Let DAs in two states confront the double voters themselves and ask how it is that they voted twice, who helped to facilitate their fraud, did anyone help pay for their travel, did they get compensation for voting twice and so forth.
Dick Morris is on my local station after Rush, and I heard his interview with the North Carolina guy. Some of the “double voting” will prove to actually be coincidental and innocent - all they are checking is the name and date of birth, and some people with the same name were born on the same date. Probably only a few, but some.

Remember the flak over Bush firing DAs for failing to do what the administration wanted? Back then, we had to remind the Democrats that Clinton had fired all the DAs to cover for the fact that he was killing the Whitewater investigations then ongoing. Turns out, the people Bush fired were refusing to follow up on this evidence.

Voting in multiple state elections is a federal issue as well as a state issue. States can cooperate among themselves to investigate this, and Morris is inserting himself into the issue to try to promote that cooperation. But no two Democrat controlled states will mind terribly if a voter votes Democrat in both states. It being painfully obvious that Democrats do not fear vote fraud because they are sure the Republicans will not outdo them at it.


31 posted on 04/11/2014 4:25:54 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; lowbridge; txrefugee; devolve; SharpRightTurn; precisionshootist; andyk; narses; ...
Aside from Dickie Morris feigning to be inconclusive about which side pulled off the lion's share of the fraud in the 2012 election, the problem with voters voting in more than one state - which is the crux of his article - represents only a small fraction of the fraud and cheating that was going on. It's one thing to talk about voters voting twice, as Dickie does here, but there are many more who voted way more than twice, mostly in the SAME state, particularly battleground states.

Let's face it: a great abettor of multiple voting fraud, whether in different states or in the same state, is early voting, which became popular in many states during the Clinton years. Let's get rid of it wherever it exists! (Of course, this should in no way interfere with advocating for other much-needed anti-fraud measures such as photo voter ID.) Integrity of the election process should always be a more important goal for state elections officials than convenience.

Morris is a pretty good statistician and frequently did and does his own polling, including during the 2012 presidential race. On the basis of his polling and that of others, he publicly predicted a comfortable Romney win. Morris intuitively knows that the main reason for the wide divergence between his prognostications and the reported results was fraud and cheating - which you can't pick-up even in the best designed polls. Hopefully, some day he'll get the courage to get into the real truth of the matter, but he doesn't do a very good job here.

32 posted on 04/11/2014 12:58:00 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Massive Voter Fraud Tainted ’12 Election

It was predicted and the biggest crime was that the GOP-E did absolutely nothing to prevent it from happening.

And here's another revelation: The GOP-E STILL hasn't done anything, consequently the dems will continue and expand their efforts in November. The result is that they won't lose the Senate and the kenyan/indonesian butt boy will be strutting around and arrogantly calling it vindication for his tyranny.

33 posted on 04/11/2014 1:16:50 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

“Let’s face it: a great abettor of multiple voting fraud...in the same state, is early voting, which became popular in many states during the Clinton years. Let’s get rid of it wherever it exists!”

Early voting will not go away. There are too many voters to process them in one day.


34 posted on 04/11/2014 1:35:29 PM PDT by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
So far the data does not indicate which side committed the fraud

Gee whiz, I wouldn't hazzard a guess to which side although all those that turned out 100% of the vote for 0 and all those who voted early and often for the usurper might have had something to do with it. And don't kid yourself the GOP wasn't in on it when they never batted an eye.

35 posted on 04/11/2014 2:12:47 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

If you’re registered in more than one state and one or more has early voting, it’s possible to vote early in one state and on Election Day in the other.


36 posted on 04/11/2014 3:20:32 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
abettor of multiple voting fraud, whether in different states or in the same state, is early voting...

Perhaps, but my bet is that most of the vote fraud lies in mail-in ballots. The get-out-the-vote push is concentrated on registration and the mail in ballots are done rather anonymously. I believe that mail in ballots should be picked up at voting headquarters with someone showing (gasp) a proper voting ID. Period. Yes, there are hardship cases, such as handicap, blind, etc. But that is a small percentage.

37 posted on 04/11/2014 4:17:21 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator ( 2+2 = V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93
Aside from Dickie Morris feigning to be inconclusive about which side pulled off the lion's share of the fraud in the 2012 election, the problem with voters voting in more than one state - which is the crux of his article - represents only a small fraction of the fraud and cheating that was going on. It's one thing to talk about voters voting twice, as Dickie does here, but there are many more who voted way more than twice, mostly in the SAME state, particularly battleground states.
I heard Morris interview the NC official who announced the number of nearly-certain double votes. And on the basis of the lack of cooperation from large states - including, incidentally, Texas and Florida - it was clear that the problem could very easily have swung the margin of victory. Morris didn’t go where the data didn’t lead, tho - no party ID data was presented to him, and he did not draw (or at least didn’t articulate) party conclusions from it.

38 posted on 04/11/2014 5:45:06 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

You and I were talking about this a year and a half ago.

What took them so long to figure it out?


39 posted on 04/11/2014 6:27:53 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; Bender2; GOPsterinMA; Clintonfatigued; NFHale; ...
So far the data does not indicate which side committed the fraud or even whether it was orchestrated at all,

Oh no? Really? Really, Dick?

You so sure he's only playing dumb?

40 posted on 04/11/2014 10:32:36 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson